Qualitative vs. quantitative methods as a psychotherapeutic tool in cancer research

Ondrusova Zuzana; Kralova Sona; Stefanikova Zdenka; Mistrik Martin; Batorova Angelika

首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >Qualitative vs. quantitative methods as a psychotherapeutic tool in cancer research

【24h】

Qualitative vs. quantitative methods as a psychotherapeutic tool in cancer research

机译：定性与定量方法作为癌症研究中的心理治疗工具

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer》 |2017年第3期|共1页
作者
Ondrusova Zuzana; Kralova Sona; Stefanikova Zdenka; Mistrik Martin; Batorova Angelika;
展开▼
作者单位

Slovak Myeloma Soc Bratislava Slovakia;

Slovak Myeloma Soc Inst Social Anthropol Bratislava Slovakia;

Slovak Myeloma Soc Bratislava Slovakia;

Comenius Univ Slovak Med Univ Med Fac Dept Hematol &

Transfusiol Bratislava Slovakia;

Comenius Univ Slovak Med Univ Med Fac Dept Hematol &

Transfusiol Bratislava Slovakia;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类肿瘤学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Qualitative vs. quantitative methods as a psychotherapeutic tool in cancer research [J] . Ondrusova Zuzana, Kralova Sona, Stefanikova Zdenka, Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer . 2017,第Suppla3期

机译：定性与定量方法作为癌症研究中的心理治疗工具
2. Quantitative vs. qualitative – do different research methods give us consistent information about our users and their library space needs? [J] . Susan E Montgomery Library Information Research : Research into Practice for Information Library Services . 2012,第111期

机译：定量与定性–不同的研究方法是否能为我们提供有关用户及其图书馆空间需求的一致信息？
3. Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Methods [J] . Irena Ograjensek, Poul Thyregod Quality progress . 2004,第1期

机译：定性与定量方法
4. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze serious games outcomes: A pilot study for a new cognitive screening tool [C] . Vallejo Vanessa, Mitache Andrei V., Tarnanas Ioannis, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society . 2015

机译：结合定性和定量方法分析严重的游戏结果：一项新的认知筛查工具的初步研究
5. From noise to characterization tool: Assessing biases and performance of influenza surveillance methods through qualitative and quantitative studies. [D] . Zhang, Ying. 2013

机译：从噪声到表征工具：通过定性和定量研究评估流感监测方法的偏倚和性能。
6. Adherence to oral anticancer chemotherapy: What influences patients’ over or non-adherence? Analysis of the OCTO study through quantitative–qualitative methods [O] . Aurélie Bourmaud, Emilie Henin, Fabien Tinquaut, 2015

机译：坚持口服抗癌化疗：是什么影响患者过度或不坚持？通过定量定性方法对OCTO研究进行分析
7. Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [O] . Quan Nha Hong, Araceli Gonzalez-Reyes, Pierre Pluye 2018

机译：改善工具的有用性，以获得定性，定量和混合方法研究的质量，混合方法评估工具（MMAT）
8. Qualitative & Quantitative Analysis of Conducted Energy Devices: TASER X26 vs. Stinger S200 [R] . Mesloh, C., Henych, M., Thompson, L. F., 2008

机译：传导能量设备的定性和定量分析：TasER X26与stinger s200

Qualitative vs. quantitative methods as a psychotherapeutic tool in cancer research

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅