首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >Implant splinting in mandibular overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
【24h】

Implant splinting in mandibular overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

机译:下颌覆盖中的植入物分裂:随机临床试验的荟萃分析系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of implant splinting on peri-implant marginal bone level and implant failures in completely edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with mandibular implant overdentures. Method and materials: A literature search of electronic databases (PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) was performed, with the last search conducted in July 2019. Randomized controlled trials with at least a 12-month follow-up period were selected. The review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two comparisons were included in the meta-analysis: (1) Two-implant supported ball versus two-implant supported bar mandibular overdenture; (2): Two- versus four-implant supported bar mandibular overdenture. Results: Six randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in a quality assessment and meta-analysis. Pooled data revealed a nonsignificant difference in marginal bone level (I-2 = 0%; P = 1; mean difference = 0.00; 95% CI -0.37 to 0.37) and implant failures (P = .24; risk ratio = 6.07; 95% CI 0.30 to 121.33) when two-implant ball overdentures were compared to two-implant bar overdentures. Similarly, there was no significant difference in marginal bone level (I-2 = 59%; P = .59; mean difference = -0.16; 95% CI -0.73 to 0.41) or implant failures (I-2 = 0%; P = .36; risk ratio = 2.03; 95% CI 0.45 to 9.16) when two- versus four-implant bar overdentures were compared. Conclusion: Based on the findings of the meta-analysis, there is no influence of implant splinting on peri-implant marginal bone level and implant failures for completely edentulous patients rehabilitated with mandibular implant overdentures. However, this result should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of analyzed studies, most of them considered at unclear risk of bias. Well-designed randomized controlled trials with follow-up periods of at least 5 years are highly recommended to establish evidence with regard to the influence of implant splinting on mandibular overdentures.
机译:目的:评估植入物夹层对颌骨植入物覆盖恢复的全面患者的植入性边缘骨水平和植入失败的影响。方法和材料:进行电子数据库的文献搜索(对受控试验的PubMed和Cochrane中央登记册[中央])进行,最后一次搜索在2019年7月进行。随机对照试验,至少有12个月的随访期选择。根据PRISMA指南进行审查和荟萃分析。荟萃分析中包括两种比较:(1)双植入物支撑的球与双植入物支撑的杆状颌骨覆盖; (2):两个 - 与四植入式支撑的条形下颌覆盖。结果:六项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,并包括在质量评估和荟萃分析中。汇集数据显示边际骨水平的无显着差异(I-2 = 0%; P = 1;平均差异= 0.00; 95%CI-0.37至0.37)和植入物故障(P = .24;风险比率= 6.07; 95当将双植入球覆盖物与双植入杆覆盖率进行比较时%CI 0.30至121.33)。同样,边际骨水平没有显着差异(I-2 = 59%; p = .59;平均差异= -0.16; 95%CI -0.73至0.41)或植入失败(I-2 = 0%; p = .36;风险比= 2.03; 95%CI 0.45至9.16),当比较了四个植入杆覆盖率。结论:基于荟萃分析的发现,植入物夹层对颌骨植入物覆盖恢复的完全薄弱患者的植入物边缘骨水平和植入失败的影响。然而,由于分析的研究数量有限,大多数以不明确的偏倚风险考虑,这一结果应谨慎地解释。强烈建议使用随访期限的精心随机对照试验,以建立植入物夹在下颌覆盖上的影响方面的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号