首页> 外文期刊>Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology >Estimation of voter transitions and the ecological fallacy
【24h】

Estimation of voter transitions and the ecological fallacy

机译:估计选民过渡与生态谬误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper attempts an investigation into the features of ecological fallacy in the context of estimation of voter transitions between two elections. After reviewing some theoretical findings from a statistical point of view, we discuss two tools for checking whether bias is present: (1) fitting models with covariates; (2) comparing the standard errors of transition probabilities computed under ideal conditions against those based on bootstrap methods. Concerning the effect of covariates, we describe two different data generating mechanisms, depending on whether voting decisions are affected by variables measured at the (1) aggregate or (2) the individual level. By theoretical arguments and empirical evidence, we show that, while modelling the effect of covariates removes bias in the first case, it may fail in the second because only aggregate level covariates are usually available. Our investigation relies on the analysis of real and artificial data sets: the latter are obtained by a computer software which mimics voting behaviour and is such that, artificial electoral data with designed size and direction of ecological bias can be produced. An application to a recent election in the city of Turin is also used to illustrate our methodology and findings.
机译:本文试图调查在两次选举之间的选民过渡的背景下调查生态谬误。从统计角度审查一些理论上的发现后,我们讨论了两种检查偏见是否存在的工具:(1)与协变量的拟合模型; (2)将在理想条件下计算的过渡概率的标准误差与基于引导方法进行比较。关于协变量的影响,我们描述了两种不同的数据生成机制,这取决于投票决策是否受到在(1)聚合或(2)个单个层面上测量的变量的影响。通过理论论点和经验证据,我们展示了,在建模协变量中的效果在第一种情况下消除偏差,在第二种情况下可能会失败,因为通常只有聚合水平协变量。我们的调查依赖于对真实和人工数据集的分析:后者通过模仿投票行为的计算机软件获得,并且可以生产具有设计尺寸和生态偏差方向的人造选举数据。在都灵市最近选举的申请也用于说明我们的方法和调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号