首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Collaboration Between Biomedical and Complementary and Alternative Care Providers: Barriers and Pathways
【24h】

Collaboration Between Biomedical and Complementary and Alternative Care Providers: Barriers and Pathways

机译:生物医学和互补和替代护理提供者之间的合作:障碍和途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We examined the scope of collaborative care for persons with mental illness as implemented by traditional healers, faith healers, and biomedical care providers. We conducted semistructured focus group discussions in Ghana, Kenya, and Nigeria with traditional healers, faith healers, biomedical care providers, patients, and their caregivers. Transcribed data were thematically analyzed. A barrier to collaboration was distrust, influenced by factionalism, charlatanism, perceptions of superiority, limited roles, and responsibilities. Pathways to better collaboration were education, formal policy recognition and regulation, and acceptance of mutual responsibility. This study provides a novel cross-national insight into the perspectives of collaboration from four stakeholder groups. Collaboration was viewed as a means to reach their own goals, rooted in a deep sense of distrust and superiority. In the absence of openness, understanding, and respect for each other, efficient collaboration remains remote. The strongest foundation for mutual collaboration is a shared sense of responsibility for patient well-being.
机译:我们审查了由传统治疗师,信仰治疗师和生物医疗服务提供商实施的精神疾病人员合作护理的范围。我们在加纳,肯尼亚和尼日利亚进行了半系统焦点小组讨论,拥有传统的治疗师,信仰治疗师,生物医疗服务提供者,患者及其护理人员。经过专题分析转录数据。协作的障碍是不信任的,受到派系主义,法兰兰主义,优越性的看法,有限的角色和责任的影响。途径更好地合作是教育,正式的政策认可和监管,并接受相互责任。本研究提供了一种新的跨国洞察力,进入四个利益相关者群体的合作的角度。被视为达到自己目标的手段,根植于深刻的不信任和优越感。在没有开放,理解和尊重的情况下,有效的合作仍然是遥控器。相互协作的最强基础是对患者福祉的共同责任感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号