...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychonomic bulletin & review >Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review
【24h】

Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review

机译:语法性别和语言相制:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many languages assign nouns to a grammatical gender class, such that "bed" might be assigned masculine gender in one language (e.g., Italian) but feminine gender in another (e.g., Spanish). In the context of research assessing the potential for language to influence thought (the linguistic relativity hypothesis), a number of scholars have investigated whether grammatical gender assignment "rubs off" on concepts themselves, such that Italian speakers might conceptualize beds as more masculine than Spanish speakers do. We systematically reviewed 43 pieces of empirical research examining grammatical gender and thought, which together tested 5,895 participants. We classified the findings in terms of their support for this hypothesis and assessed the results against parameters previously identified as potentially influencing outcomes. Overall, we found that support was strongly task- and context-dependent, and rested heavily on outcomes that have clear and equally viable alternative explanations. We also argue that it remains unclear whether grammatical gender is in fact a useful tool for investigating relativity.
机译:许多语言将名词分配给语法性别课,这样“床”可能以一种语言(例如,意大利语)分配男性性别,但在另一个语言中(例如,意大利语),而是女性性别(例如,西班牙语)。在研究的背景下,评估语言影响思想的潜力(语言相对性假设),许多学者们调查了语法性别分配是否在概念本身上“擦掉”,使意大利语演讲者可能会概念化床,比西班牙语更像男性化发言者。我们系统地审查了43种实证研究审查了语法性别和思想,共同测试了5,895名参与者。我们在对该假设的支持方面分类了调查结果,并评估了先前被确定为潜在影响结果的参数的结果。总的来说,我们发现支持是强烈的任务和上下文依赖性,并严重依赖于具有明确和同样可行的替代解释的结果。我们还认为,尚不清楚语法性别是否实际上是一种调查相对性的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号