首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >The Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI): Assessing Transdiagnostic Dimensions to Validate a Profile Approach to Emotional Disorder Classification
【24h】

The Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI): Assessing Transdiagnostic Dimensions to Validate a Profile Approach to Emotional Disorder Classification

机译:多维情感障碍库存(MEDI):评估跨透明度尺寸以验证对情绪障碍分类的剖面方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been limited progress evaluating the validity of dimensional approaches to emotional disorder classification. This has occurred in part because of a lack of standardized assessment tools developed with the specific intent of studying dimensional classification. The goal of the current study was to develop and validate the Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI) to efficiently assess nine empirically supported transdiagnostic dimensions proposed in the Brown and Barlow (2009) profile approach to emotional disorder classification: neurotic temperament, positive temperament, depression, autonomic arousal, somatic anxiety, social anxiety, intrusive cognitions, traumatic reexperiencing, and avoidance. The MEDI factor structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity was evaluated in outpatients with emotional disorders (pilot sample = 227; validation sample = 780). The final 9-factor solution fit the data well. Intercorrelations among MEDI factors were consistent with previous research, and all MEDI dimensions had acceptable reliability. Correlations with common self-report questionnaires and DSM-5 diagnoses supported the convergent/discriminant validity of all nine MEDI dimensions. Collectively, these results support the use of 49-item MEDI in clinical research samples. The MEDI should be used in future research to evaluate the validity of the Brown and Barlow (2009) approach to emotional disorder classification. Because it provides an efficient assessment of several well-established emotional disorder traits and phenotypes, the MEDI also may have utility for general research or clinical purposes.
机译:有限的进展进展评估了情绪障碍分类的尺寸方法的有效性。这是部分发生的,因为缺乏具有学习尺寸分类的具体目的的标准化评估工具。目前的研究的目标是开发和验证多维情感障碍库存(MEDI),以有效地评估棕色和巴洛(2009)型曲线疾病的九个经验支持的Transdiagnostic尺寸,以情绪障碍分类:神经质气质,正气质,抑郁症,自主主义唤醒,体细胞焦虑,社交焦虑,侵入性认知,创伤性重新分发和避免。在情绪障碍的门诊患者中评估了MEDI因子结构,可靠性和收敛/判别有效性(试验样本= 227;验证样本= 780)。最终的9因子解决方案适合数据。 MEDI因素中的互连与先前的研究一致,所有MEDI尺寸都具有可接受的可靠性。与普通自我报告问卷和DSM-5的相关性支持所有九个MEDI尺寸的收敛/判别有效性。总的来说,这些结果支持在临床研究样本中使用49项Medi。 MEDI应该在将来的研究中使用,以评估棕色和巴洛(2009)的有效性来对情绪障碍分类的方法。因为它提供了对几种成熟的情绪障碍性状和表型的有效评估,所以Medi也可能具有普通研究或临床目的的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号