首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Nutrition >The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia
【24h】

The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia

机译:公共卫生营养问题的政治建设:对澳大利亚儿童的垃圾食品营销议会争论的框架分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Junk-food marketing contributes significantly to childhood obesity, which in turn imposes major health and economic burdens. Despite this, political priority for addressing junk-food marketing has been weak in many countries. Competing interests, worldviews and beliefs of stakeholders involved with the issue contribute to this political inertia. An integral group of actors for driving policy change are parliamentarians, who champion policy and enact legislation. However, how parliamentarians interpret and portray (i.e. frame) the causes and solutions of public health nutrition problems is poorly understood. The present study aimed to understand how Australian parliamentarians from different political parties frame the problem of junk-food marketing. Design: Framing analysis of transcripts from the Australian Government's Parliamentary Hansard, involving development of a theoretical framework, data collection, coding transcripts and thematic synthesis of results. Settings: Australia. Participants: None. Results: Parliamentarian framing generally reflected political party ideology. Liberal parliamentarians called for minimal government regulation and greater personal responsibility, reflecting the party's core values of liberalism and neoliberalism. Greens parliamentarians framed the issue as systemic, highlighting the need for government intervention and reflecting the core party value of social justice. Labor parliamentarians used both frames at varying times. Conclusions: Parliamentarians' framing was generally consistent with their party ideology, though subject to changes over time. This project provides insights into the role of framing and ideology in shaping public health policy responses and may inform communication strategies for nutrition advocates. Advocates might consider using frames that resonate with the ideologies of different political parties and adapting these over time.
机译:目的:垃圾食品营销对儿童肥胖有贡献大大,这反过来又施加了重大的健康和经济负担。尽管如此,许多国家的解决垃圾食品营销的政治优先事项已经薄弱。参与该问题的利益攸关方的竞争利益,世界观和信仰有助于这种政治惯性。用于驾驶政策变革的一组成部分行动者是议员,世卫组织,世卫组织政策和制定立法。但是,议员如何解释和描绘(即框架)公共卫生营养问题的原因和解决方案知之甚少。本研究旨在了解不同政党的澳大利亚议员如何框架垃圾食品营销问题。设计:澳大利亚政府议会议会成绩单的框架分析,涉及开发理论框架,数据收集,编码成绩单和结果的主题合成。设置:澳大利亚。参与者:没有。结果:议员框架普遍反映政党意识形态。自由主义议员呼吁最低政府监管和更大的个人责任,反映了党的自由主义和新自由主义的核心价值观。绿党议员诬陷了这个问题作为系统性,突出了政府干预的必要性,并反映了社会正义的核心党价值。劳动议员在不同时间使用两个框架。结论:议员的框架通常与党派理想一致,但受到时间随着时间的变化。该项目在塑造公共卫生政策响应方面的框架和意识形态的作用,可以为营养倡导者提供通信策略。倡导者可能考虑使用与不同政党的意识形态产生共鸣并随着时间的推移适应这些框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号