【24h】

Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action

机译:越来越多的疫苗接种:将心理科学付诸行动

获取原文
           

摘要

Vaccination is one of the great achievements of the 20th century, yet persistent public-health problems include inadequate, delayed, and unstable vaccination uptake. Psychology offers three general propositions for understanding and intervening to increase uptake where vaccines are available and affordable. The first proposition is that thoughts and feelings can motivate getting vaccinated. Hundreds of studies have shown that risk beliefs and anticipated regret about infectious disease correlate reliably with getting vaccinated; low confidence in vaccine effectiveness and concern about safety correlate reliably with not getting vaccinated. We were surprised to find that few randomized trials have successfully changed what people think and feel about vaccines, and those few that succeeded were minimally effective in increasing uptake. The second proposition is that social processes can motivate getting vaccinated. Substantial research has shown that social norms are associated with vaccination, but few interventions examined whether normative messages increase vaccination uptake. Many experimental studies have relied on hypothetical scenarios to demonstrate that altruism and free riding (i.e., taking advantage of the protection provided by others) can affect intended behavior, but few randomized trials have tested strategies to change social processes to increase vaccination uptake. The third proposition is that interventions can facilitate vaccination directly by leveraging, but not trying to change, what people think and feel. These interventions are by far the most plentiful and effective in the literature. To increase vaccine uptake, these interventions build on existing favorable intentions by facilitating action (through reminders, prompts, and primes) and reducing barriers (through logistics and healthy defaults); these interventions also shape behavior (through incentives, sanctions, and requirements). Although identification of principles for changing thoughts and feelings to motivate vaccination is a work in progress, psychological principles can now inform the design of systems and policies to directly facilitate action.
机译:疫苗接种是20世纪的伟大成就之一,但持续的公共卫生问题包括不足,延迟和不稳定的疫苗接种摄取。心理学提供了三种普遍主张,以便了解和干预以增加吸收疫苗可用和实惠的摄取。第一个命题是思想和感情可以激励接种疫苗。数百项研究表明,风险信仰和预期对传染病的遗憾与接种疫苗相关;对疫苗有效性的低置信度和对安全性可靠相关的担忧,没有接种疫苗。我们惊讶地发现很少有随机试验已经成功地改变了人们对疫苗的思考和感受,并且成功的少数人在增加增收时最有效。第二个命题是社会过程可以激励接种疫苗。实质性研究表明,社会规范与疫苗接种有关,但仍有很少的干预措施检查了规范性消息是否增加了疫苗接种摄取。许多实验研究依赖于假设情景,以证明利他主义和自由骑行(即,利用其他人提供的保护)可以影响预期行为,但很少有随机试验已经测试了改变社会流程的策略,以增加接种疫苗接种的策略。第三个命题是干预措施可以通过利用,但没有试图改变,人们的思考和感受,可以促进疫苗接种。这些干预措施是迄今为止在文献中最丰富而有效的。为了增加疫苗摄取,这些干预措施通过促进行动(通过提醒,提示和素质)和减少障碍(通过物流和健康违约)来构建现有的有利意图;这些干预措施还形成行为(通过激励,制裁和要求)。虽然确定了改变思想和激励疫苗接种的思想和感情的原则是一项正在进行的工作,心理原则现在可以为系统和政策的设计通知直接促进行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号