...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >Sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in obsessive compulsive disorder: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in obsessive compulsive disorder: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:强迫症的性功能障碍及满意度:系统审查的协议和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic mental health condition recognized as one of the most serious causes of disability and impaired quality of life. In the literature, there is no review about sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in OCD. The current paper presents the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize data (1) comparing the presence of sexual dysfunction between groups with OCD and non-clinical groups, (2) investigating prevalence of each one of the sexual dysfunctions in patients with OCD, (3) comparing risk for sexual dysfunction in OCD groups with the prevalence in control groups, (4) comparing sexual satisfaction between OCD groups and non-clinical groups, and (5) investigating moderators of sexual dysfunction in OCD groups as compared with control groups. Gender, age, marital status, OCD symptom severity and subtypes, comorbid depressive disorders, comorbid anxiety disorders, concurrent psychiatric medications, comorbid general medical disease, and study quality will be investigated as moderators. Methods The protocol is reported according to PRISMA-P guidelines. The search will be conducted by independent reviewers during the second week of December 2019 by using electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library), by contacting the authors of the included studies to identify further data, by examining the references of the included studies, and by handsearching conference proceedings and theses/doctoral dissertations. The study quality will be independently evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Random-effect meta-analyses will be computed. If there is insufficient data for a specific outcome, only a systematic review will be performed. Discussion This review may support clinical practice highlighting the importance of the assessment of sexuality in patients with OCD and suggesting the use of therapeutic strategies dedicated to sexuality in this clinical population with the aim of improving patients' quality of life. Potential limitations will regard the heterogeneity of the studies in terms of the instruments used to assess sexual dysfunction/satisfaction and of the definitions used to conceptualize sexual dysfunction. Systematic review registration Prospero CRD42019132264
机译:背景强迫症(OCD)是一种慢性心理健康状况,被认为是最严重的残疾原因之一和生命质量受损。在文献中,在OCD中没有关于性功能障碍和满意度的审查。本文介绍了系统审查和荟萃分析的议定书,旨在总结数据(1)与OCD和非临床组之间的群体之间存在性功能障碍的存在,(2)研究每种性功能障碍的患病率OCD患者,(3)与对照组的患病率相比,对对照组的患病率进行性功能障碍风险,(4)比较OCD组和非临床组的性满意度,以及(5)调查OCD组性功能障碍的主持人与对照组相比。性别,年龄,婚姻状况,强迫症症状严重程度和亚型,可染色体抑郁症,可康焦虑障碍,同型精神病药物,同型精神病毒药物,同型医疗疾病和研究质量将作为主持人进行调查。方法根据Prisma-P指南报告该协议。通过使用电子数据库(SCoPus,PubMed,Embase,Psycinfo,Cinahl和Cochrane图书馆),通过联系包括所包含的研究的作者来识别进一步的数据,通过独立审阅者在2019年12月的第二周进行检查所包含的研究的参考文献,并通过调查会议程序和论文/博士论文。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华质量评估规模独立评估研究质量。将计算随机效应元分析。如果有足够的数据进行特定结果,则将执行系统审查。讨论本综述可能支持临床实践,突出了对OCD患者的性能评估的重要性,并建议使用致力于性行为的治疗策略,以提高患者的生活质量。潜在的限制将在用于评估性功能障碍/满意度和用于概念性功能障碍的定义的仪器方面对研究的异质性。系统评论登记Prospero CRD42019132264

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号