...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology >Influence of RunScribe (TM) placement on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running
【24h】

Influence of RunScribe (TM) placement on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running

机译:Runscribe(TM)放置对跑步期间的时空步态特征精度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study aimed to examine the influence of RunScribe location (i.e. lace shoe vs heel shoe) on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running by comparing data with a high-speed video analysis system at 1000 Hz. A total of 49 endurance runners performed a running protocol on a treadmill at comfortable velocity. Two systems were used to determine spatiotemporal parameters (i.e. contact time, flight time, step frequency, and step length) during running: high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz and two different RunScribe placements (i.e. lace shoe vs heel shoe). The pairwise comparisons showed some between-system differences in both lace shoe (contact time: p = 0.009; step frequency: p = 0.001) and heel shoe (flight time: p = 0.006; step frequency: p = 0.010), although the effect sizes were small (effect size < 0.3 in all cases). The intraclass correlation coefficients revealed an almost perfect association between systems for contact time and flight time (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.90), and step length and step frequency (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.96-0.97), regardless of the RunScribe placement. Bland-Altman plots revealed that the lace shoe location yielded smaller systematic bias, random errors, and narrower limits of agreement for spatiotemporal parameters during running, except for SF, which had a higher accuracy in a heel shoe location. The results suggest that RunScribe is a valid system to measure spatiotemporal parameters during running on a treadmill according to a high-speed video analysis at 1000 Hz. In addition, the data indicate that the location of the RunScribe system (lace shoe vs heel shoe) plays an important role on the accuracy of spatiotemporal parameters. The lace shoe placement showed smaller systematic bias, random errors, and narrower limits of agreement for contact time, flight time, and step length, whereas the heel shoe placement was slightly more accurate for the step frequency.
机译:该研究旨在通过将数据与1000Hz的高速视频分析系统进行比较,来研究Rubscribe位置(即蕾丝鞋鞋跟鞋跟鞋子)对时空步态特性的准确性的影响。共有49个耐力赛跑者在舒适的速度下在跑步机上执行了运行协议。在运行期间,使用两种系统来确定时空参数(即接触时间,飞行时间,步进频率和步长):高速视频分析1000 Hz和两种不同的Runscribe放置(即蕾丝鞋与脚跟鞋)。双向比较显示两个蕾丝鞋之间的系统差异(接触时间:P = 0.009;步进频率:P = 0.001)和鞋跟鞋(飞行时间:P = 0.006;步进频率:P = 0.010),但效果尺寸很小(所有情况下效果大小<0.3)。内部相关系数显示出用于接触时间和飞行时间的系统之间的几乎完美的关联(跨脑相关系数:0.85-0.90),以及步长和步进频率(跨越相关系数:0.96-0.97),无论进行RUNSICE放置。 Bland-Altman情节透露,在运行期间,蕾丝鞋位置产生较小的系统偏差,随机误差和时空参数协议的窄限制,除了SF,在鞋跟位置具有更高的准确性。结果表明,根据1000Hz的高速视频分析,Rudscribe是一种有效的系统,用于测量在跑步机上运行时在跑步机上运行。此外,数据表明,Runscribe系统的位置(蕾丝鞋VS鞋跟)对时空参数的准确性起着重要作用。蕾丝鞋放置显示出较小的系统偏差,随机误差和接触时间,飞行时间和步长的较窄限制,而步进鞋跟放置对于阶梯频率稍微准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号