首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Effects of Emergency Medical Services Agency Ownership Status on Patient Transport
【24h】

Effects of Emergency Medical Services Agency Ownership Status on Patient Transport

机译:紧急医疗服务机构所有权地位对患者运输的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Medical insurers have clearly defined which ambulance services will be reimbursed and which will not. Thus, ambulance agencies that provide emergency 9-1-1 services must be highly cognizant of their organization's revenue needs. This presents a distinction between publicly funded and privately funded organizations. This study seeks to identify any differences in the transport decision among agency ownership types. Methods: This retrospective study captured all 9-1-1 ambulance requests in the state of Virginia for the years 2009 through 2013. Each request was answered by either a publicly funded ambulance service or a privately funded ambulance service. The outcome variable of interest was patient disposition and the key explanatory variable was organizational ownership type. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized for data analysis. Results: Of the 4.6million 9-1-1 requests, approximately 30% were attended to by a private ambulance service. After controlling for potential confounders, ownership type was found to have a statistically significant effect on the transport decision. Private for-profit ambulance services were 4.5times more likely to transport a patient than were their publicly funded counterparts (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 4.47-4.65). Private non-profit organizations were twice as likely to engage in patient transport (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 2.09-2.14). Private for-profit ambulance organizations were also found to be less likely to allow for patient refusal (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53-0.55) or to medically treat on-scene without subsequent transport (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.50). Conclusions: Given the reimbursement practices of medical insurers, private ambulance services are incentivized towards patient transport. Operational revenue for these services is not generated through public budgeting processes but through user fees. Thus, private agencies are more reliant on billable services than are their publicly funded counterparts.
机译:目标:医疗保险公司已明确定义将报销哪些救护车服务,这将不会。因此,提供紧急情况9-1-1服务的救护车机构必须高度认识到其组织的收入需求。这介绍了公共资助和私人资助组织之间的区别。本研究旨在识别机构所有权类型之间的运输决定差异。方法:这项回顾性研究捕获了弗吉尼亚州2009年至2013年弗吉尼亚州的所有9-1-1救护车请求。每个请求由公共资助的救护车服务或私人资助的救护车服务回答。感兴趣的结果变量是患者处理,关键解释变量是组织所有权类型。用于数据分析的多变量逻辑回归。结果:私人救护业务服务于4.6亿9-1-1个要求,大约30%的人参加。在控制潜在混乱者之后,发现所有权类型对运输决定具有统计上显着的影响。私人营利救护车服务比其公开资助的同行(或:4.56,95%CI:4.47-4.65)运输,私人救护车服务均为4.5倍。私人非营利组织患者运输的可能性是两倍(或:2.12,95%CI:2.09-2.14)。私人营利性救护车组织也发现允许患者拒绝(或:0.54,95%CI:0.53-0.55)或医学上无需随后运输(或:0.48,95%CI: 0.45-0.50)。结论:鉴于医疗保险公司的报销做法,私人救护车服务对患者运输而受到激励。这些服务的运营收入不是通过公共预算流程产生的,而是通过用户费用产生。因此,私人机构更依赖于可支付的服务,而不是其公开资助的同行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号