首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >PREDICTORS OF DEFINITIVE AIRWAY SANS HYPOXIA/HYPOTENSION ON FIRST ATTEMPT (DASH-1A) SUCCESS IN TRAUMATICALLY INJURED PATIENTS UNDERGOING PREHOSPITAL INTUBATION
【24h】

PREDICTORS OF DEFINITIVE AIRWAY SANS HYPOXIA/HYPOTENSION ON FIRST ATTEMPT (DASH-1A) SUCCESS IN TRAUMATICALLY INJURED PATIENTS UNDERGOING PREHOSPITAL INTUBATION

机译:最终气道缺氧/低血压的预测因子在第一次尝试(DASH-1A)在进行的预防预防患者中的第一次尝试(DASH-1A)成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Prehospital intubation success is routinely treated as a dichotomous outcome based on an endotracheal tube passing through vocal cords regardless of number of attempts or occurrence of hypoxia, or hypotension, which are associated with worse outcomes. We explore patient, provider, and procedure-related variables associated with successful definitive airway sans hypoxia/hypotension on first attempt (DASH-1A) in traumatically injured subjects undergoing endotracheal intubation at the scene of injury by a helicopter EMS system. Methods: This single-center retrospective chart review included patients with traumatic injuries and at least one attempted intubation by helicopter EMS at the scene of injury. Demographic and clinical variables were tested for association with DASH-1A and overall first-attempt success using univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression to produce adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Purposeful backwards stepwise elimination was used to develop logistic regression models for outcomes. Initial inclusion of covariates in multivariable models was based on clinical judgement, known or suspected risk factors and confounders for intubation success, and univariate associations. Results: Of 419 subjects screened, 263 met inclusion criteria. Median age was 34 years and the majority of subjects were Caucasian (95%), male (76%), and suffered blunt trauma (90%). The endotracheal tube was successfully placed on the first attempt in 198 (75.3%) of patients, but only 142 (55.3%) had a successful DASH-1A, and overall, 246 (94%) had an endotracheal tube passed successfully before hospital arrival. Factors significantly associated with successful DASH-1A were no ground EMS intubation attempt prior to arrival [aOR 2.2 (CI 1.0-4.9)], lack of airway secretions/blood [1.9 (1.0-3.4)], Cormack-Lehane Score of I and II [12.3 (4.5-33.2) & 3.2 (1.2-9.1), respectively], and bougie use [5.4 (1.8-15.8)]. For endotracheal tube passing only, the following were significantly associated with first pass success: grade of view I and II [aORs 87.3 (CI 25.8-295.7) & 6.8 (2.3-19.5), respectively], lack of secretions/blood [4.9 (2.1-11.2), bougie use [7.8 (2.3-26.3)], direct laryngoscopy [5.1 (1.5-17.0)] and not using apneic oxygenation through a nasal cannula [2.5 (1.1-5.6)]. Conclusion: In our helicopter EMS system, successful endotracheal intubation on the first attempt and without an episode of hypoxia was associated with no ground EMS intubation attempt prior to flight crew arrival, lack of airway secretions/blood, Cormack-Lehane Score, and bougie use.
机译:背景:预核插管成功是基于通过声带通过声带的内插管,无论缺氧的次数或低氧的发生如何,都是一种基于声带的二分的结果,或者与更严重的结果相关。我们探索与成功的最终气道SANS缺氧/低血压相关的患者,提供者和程序相关的变量在首次尝试(DASH-1A)中,在由直升机EMS系统受伤现场进行气管内插管的创伤受试者中的第一次尝试(DASH-1A)。方法:该单中心回顾性图表复查包括创伤损伤的患者,并在伤害现场通过直升机EMS试图插管。使用单变量比较和多变量的逻辑回归和多变量的逻辑回归来测试人口统计和临床变量,以及使用单变量比较和多变量的逻辑回归来产生调整后的大量比率(AOR)和95%置信区间(CIS)。有目的向后逐步消除用于开发结果的逻辑回归模型。在多变量模型中初步包含协变量是基于临床判断,已知或疑似风险因素和监管成功的困境,以及单变量协会。结果:419个受试者筛选,263名符合纳入标准。中位年龄为34岁,大多数受试者是白种人(95%),男性(76%),患有钝的创伤(90%)。在198年(75.3%)患者的第一次尝试中成功地放置了气管插管,但只有142次(55.3%)患有成功的Dash-1a,总体而言,246(94%)在医院到达之前成功通过了内插管。与成功的Dash-1a显着相关的因素是在抵达之前的Ground EMS插管试图[AOR 2.2(CI 1.0-4.9)],缺乏气道分泌物/血液[1.9(1.0-3.4)],COMACK-LEHANE I和COMACK-LEHANE评分II [12.3(4.5-33.2)&3.2(1.2-9.1),分别]和Bougie使用[5.4(1.8-15.8)]。仅用于进气管通过,下列结果与第一次通过成功显着相关:观察等级I和II [AORS 87.3(CI 25.8-295.7)和6.8(2.3-19.5),缺乏分泌物/血液[4.9( 2.1-11.2),手动使用[7.8(2.3-26.3)],直接喉镜检查[5.1(1.5-17.0)]而不是通过鼻插管使用通尿氧合[2.5(1.1-5.6)]。结论:在我们的直升机EMS系统中,在第一次尝试和没有缺氧集的情况下成功的气管内插管与在飞行机组人员到来之前没有接地EMS插管尝试,缺乏气道分泌物/血液,CORMACK-LEHANE评分和携带。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号