...
首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >Comparing agroforestry systems' ex ante adoption potential and ex post adoption: on-farm participatory research from southern Malawi
【24h】

Comparing agroforestry systems' ex ante adoption potential and ex post adoption: on-farm participatory research from southern Malawi

机译:比较农林业系统的事前采用潜力和事后采用:马拉维南部的农场参与性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Agroforestry (AF) systems have been the focus of numerous research and development projects in southern Africa, yet their adoption rate generally remains low. Employing on-farm, participatory research techniques in southern Malawi, we compared the suitability of three AF-based systems that relay crop the dominant staple, maize (Zea mays), with the perennial legumes Sesbania sesban, Tephrosia vogelii, and Cajanus cajan (pigeonpea). Our secondary objective was to compare two methodologies employed to investigate AF adoption: farming systems based ex ante adoption potential and ex post adoption analysis. Nineteen percent of farmers preferred S. sesban, 26% T. vogelii, and 55% pigeonpea. Between 2001 and 2003, S. sesban adoption ranged from 3 to 6%, T. vogelii from 16 to 20%, and pigeonpea from 76 to 100%. Pigeonpea and T. vogelii were primarily preferred and adopted for their immediate livelihood benefits-a secondary food source in the case of pigeonpea and a fish poison in the case of T. vogelii. Though S. sesban was the most promising in terms of biophysical impacts, many farmers found it labor intensive and its lack of immediate livelihood benefits was a deterrent to adoption. With food insecurity a pervasive hardship in the region, farmers will likely continue to focus on satisfying immediate livelihood needs before prioritizing longer-term soil-quality improvement techniques. Both ex ante adoption potential and ex post adoption analysis contributed distinct and valuable data, and relying on either exclusively would have limited our understanding of the AF systems.
机译:农林系统一直是南部非洲众多研究与开发项目的重点,但总体上采用率仍然很低。我们利用马拉维南部的农场,参与式研究技术,比较了三种以AF为基础的系统的适用性,这些系统以农作物为主要主粮玉米(Zea mays),多年生豆类Sesbania sesban,Tephrosia vogelii和Cajanus cajan(鸽子) )。我们的次要目标是比较用于调查AF采纳的两种方法:基于事前采用潜力的耕作系统和采用后的分析。 19%的农民更喜欢S. sesban,26%的T. vogelii和55%的木豆。在2001年至2003年之间,塞塞酵母的收养率在3%至6%之间,伏格氏菌在16%至20%之间,木豆在76%至100%之间。首选木豆和T. vogelii,因为它们具有直接的生计利益,在木豆的情况下是次要食物来源,在T. vogelii的情况下是鱼毒。尽管就生物物理影响而言,S。sesban是最有前途的,但许多农民发现它劳动强度大,而且缺乏直接的生计利益也阻碍了收养。由于该地区普遍存在粮食不安全问题,农民在继续优先考虑长期土壤质量改良技术之前,可能会继续专注于满足眼前的生计需求。事前采用的潜力和事后采用的分析都贡献了独特而有价值的数据,并且仅依靠这两者将限制我们对自动对焦系统的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号