...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy research international: the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy >“The more you did, the more it made sense”: Problem‐based learning to improve early evidence‐based practice in an undergraduate physiotherapy professional programme
【24h】

“The more you did, the more it made sense”: Problem‐based learning to improve early evidence‐based practice in an undergraduate physiotherapy professional programme

机译:“你所做的越多,它的感觉就越多,”:基于问题的学习,改善本科物理治疗专业计划中的早期证据实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background and Purpose Evidence‐based practice (EBP), which integrates clinical reasoning skills, research evidence, and patient preference, has become standard in curricula for health care professional programs. Students however perceive EBP as difficult and often irrelevant to clinical practice. Methods A problem‐based learning (PBL) approach is trialled in an early stage module where EBP knowledge and skills are stated learning outcomes. Prior to this, the content‐based approach to EBP teaching and learning received negative student feedback. The impact of delivering EBP through PBL is evaluated by comparing 5 standard Likert feedback scales and open‐ended question responses relating to the EBP instruction in the module before and after a PBL approach was implemented. The impact of a PBL approach on EBP profiles is further examined under domains (relevance, sympathy, terminology, practice, and confidence) of the validated Evidence‐based Practice Profile Questionnaire. Results All mean Likert scores relating to subject understanding, relevance of assessments, achievement of learning outcomes, teaching, and overall module satisfaction improved when the PBL approach was compared with the lecture‐based format ( p ??0.05). Student comment post‐PBL continued to identify EBP as a difficult concept, but now comments on the teaching and assessment approach were mainly positive, addressing the collaborative nature of PBL, identifying EBP, communication and team‐working skills acquired, praising the real life, practical application of EBP taken, and commenting on improvement in EBP self‐efficacy. Within group change in the Evidence‐based Practice Profile Questionnaire following a PBL approach identified significant improvement in EBP domains of terminology (mean change 3.38; p ??0.001); practice (mean change 16.5; p ??0.001), and confidence (mean change 10.1; p ?=?0.008). Conceptual links, based on constructivist underpinnings of PBL and EBP, are developed in the paper. Conclusions Using mixed methods evaluation, PBL is effective at promoting early EBP. Students identified with the interactive, collaborative, and experiential nature of PBL to EBP instruction.
机译:摘要背景和目的循证实践(EBP),综合临床推理技能,研究证据和患者偏好,已成为医疗保健专业计划课程的标准。然而,学生认为EBP难以与临床实践无关紧要。方法采用基于问题的学习(PBL)方法在早期模块中试验,其中EBP知识和技能是在学习结果的情况下。在此之前,基于内容的EBP教学方法接受了负面学生反馈。通过比较在实现PBL方法之前和之后的模块中的模块中的EBP指令有关的5标准浪潮反馈比例和开放式问题响应来评估交付EBP到PBL的影响。 PBL方法对EBP简介的影响进一步审查了经过验证的基于证据的实践概况问卷调查问卷的域名(相关性,同情,术语,实践和信心)。结果与基于讲座的形式进行PBBL方法时,所有平均李克特分数有关的主题理解,评估相关性,学习成果,教学和整体模块满足的结果得到改善(P?& 0.05)。学生评论后PBL继续识别EBP作为一个困难的概念,但现在对教学和评估方法的评论主要是积极的,解决PBL的协作性质,识别获得的EBP,沟通和团队工作技能,赞扬现实生活,赞扬现实生活, EBP的实际应用,评论改善EBP自我效能。在课程的基于证据的实践概况中,PBL方法后的基于证据的实践概况调查问卷中确定了术语的EBP结构域的显着改善(平均变化3.38; p?<0.001);练习(平均变化16.5;p≤≤0.001)和置信度(平均变化10.1; p?= 0.008)。根据PBL和EBP的构造基础,概念链接是在纸上开发的。结论采用混合方法评价,PBL有效促进早期EBP。学生用PBL的互动,协作和体验性质确定为EBP指令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号