首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >MBBS student perceptions about physiology subject teaching and objective structured practical examination based formative assessment for improving competencies
【24h】

MBBS student perceptions about physiology subject teaching and objective structured practical examination based formative assessment for improving competencies

机译:MBBS学生对生理学科教学的理解以及基于客观结构化实践考试的形成性评估,以提高能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objectives of the present study were to 1) assess student attitudes to physiology, 2) evaluate student opinions about the influence of an objective structured practical examination (OSPE) on competence, and 3) assess the validity and reliability of an indigenously designed feedback questionnaire. A structured questionnaire containing 16 item statements, 8 items on an Osgood's 5-point semantic differential scale and 8 items on a Likert's 5-point scale, was used. Options were assigned scores of 1-5 according to weightage. For Osgood's semantic differential scale items, a = 2-test was done to analyze student attitudes toward the subject. For Likert scale items, mean score and SD were calculated to analyze student opinions of the OSPE. Item validity was assessed by item analysis, and reliability was assessed by calculating Crohnbach's =. The subject as a whole was interesting to 82% of the students (n = 135). The theory was interesting to 75% of the students (n = 132) but complex to 42% (n = 118). The practical was interesting to 93% of the students (n = 134); 76% of the students (n = 104) felt that the practical was simple, whereas 4% felt it was complex. The OSPE was interesting to 79% of the students (n = 131); 57% of the students (n = 116) felt it was simple, whereas 24% found it complex. Components of the subject, intricateness, and student interests were strongly associated. Students chose options on a higher weight scale, favoring the OSPE. Items were found to be valid and reliable. In conclusion, the subject of physiology was interesting but not simple to understand. Student interests varied with the components of the subject, and the components of the subject had varied intricateness. Students were in favor of the OSPE for assessment. The questionnaire used for the study was valid and reliable.
机译:本研究的目的是:1)评估学生对生理学的态度,2)评估学生对客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)对能力的影响的观点,以及3)评估本地设计的反馈调查表的有效性和可靠性。使用了结构化的问卷,该问卷包含16项陈述,Osgood的5点语义差异量表上的8项和Likert的5点量表上的8项。根据权重,选项的得分为1-5。对于Osgood的语义差异量表项目,进行了= 2检验以分析学生对该主题的态度。对于李克特量表项目,计算平均得分和标准差,以分析OSPE的学生意见。通过项目分析评估项目的有效性,并通过计算克罗恩巴赫(Crohnbach's)评估可靠性。整个课程对82%的学生很有趣(n = 135)。该理论对75%的学生(n = 132)很有趣,但对42%(n = 118)的学生很复杂。 93%的学生(n = 134)对实践很感兴趣; 76%的学生(n = 104)认为实践很简单,而4%的学生认为很复杂。 OSPE吸引了79%的学生(n = 131); 57%的学生(n = 116)认为它很简单,而24%的学生认为它很复杂。学科的组成部分,复杂性和学生的兴趣紧密相关。学生选择体重较高的选项,以支持OSPE。物品被认为是有效和可靠的。总之,生理学主题很有趣,但并不容易理解。学生的兴趣随科目组成的不同而变化,科目的组成也错综复杂。学生们赞成OSPE进行评估。用于研究的问卷是有效和可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号