...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >Introduction of student-led physiology tutorial classes to atraditional curriculum
【24h】

Introduction of student-led physiology tutorial classes to atraditional curriculum

机译:将以学生为主导的生理学辅导课引入传统课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The curriculum inthe University of Ruhuna Medical School is of the traditional type.Most teaching activities are faculty member-led activities. Sincestudent-centered learning processes are considered to improve certainskills and attitudes, we introduced student-led group classes (SGCs) inphysiology. Depending on the outcome of the SGCs, we planned todevelop it further. We designed this study to compare student percep-tions on newly introduced SGCs with traditional tutorials (TTs).Student perceptions were assessed using a mixed qualitative andquantitative method. Students recognized and appreciated some fa-vorable features of the SGC, such as the opportunity for discussion,quality of the knowledge, active participation, improvement of pre-sentation ability, and increased breadth of knowledge. However, themajority of students preferred the 'FT over the SGC despite thehighlighted benefits of the SGC. Students appreciated the focusedlearning for examinations, written preparation, and more tutor in-volvement in the TT. Students requested a hybrid of the TT and SGCby incorporating mandatory written answers to the SGC with greatercontributions from faculty members. Assessment methods that werenot aligned with the SGC and ingrained passive didactic teaching-learning methods by students and faculty members had a negativeeffect on the implementation of SGCs. Cultural and economicalfactors also contributed adversely. In the second step of this Plan-Do-Check-Act process, we are planning to introduce new formativeassessment to assess higher-order cognitive skills and a compulsorytutor training program. Some favorable components from the TT willbe incorporated to the SGC.
机译:鲁哈纳大学医学院的课程是传统课程,大多数教学活动是由教员主导的活动。由于以学生为中心的学习过程被认为可以提高某些技能和态度,因此我们引入了学生主导的小组课程(SGC)生理学。根据SGC的结果,我们计划进一步开发它。我们设计了这项研究,以将学生对新引入的SGC的认知与传统教程(TT)进行比较。使用混合的定性和定量方法评估学生的感知能力。学生认识并赞赏SGC的一些有利功能,例如讨论的机会,知识的质量,积极参与,提高陈述前的能力以及知识的广度。但是,尽管SGC具有突出的优点,但大多数学生还是喜欢使用FT而不是SGC。学生对TT的考试,书面准备和更多的导师参与的集中学习表示赞赏。学生要求通过将对SGC的强制性书面回答与教员的更大贡献相结合的方式,将TT和SGC进行混合。与SGC不一致的评估方法以及学生和教职员工根深蒂固的被动式教学法对SGC的实施有负面影响。文化和经济因素也做出了不利的贡献。在“计划-执行-检查-行动”过程的第二步中,我们计划引入新的形成性评估,以评估高阶认知技能和强制性教师培训计划。 TT的一些有利组件将合并到SGC中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号