首页> 外文期刊>Petroleum Review >Energy transition:evolution or revolution?
【24h】

Energy transition:evolution or revolution?

机译:能源转型:进化或革命?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The pace of energy transition varies considerably among 15 leading international oil and gas companies according to a new report commissioned by research consultancy CMS,reports Brian Davis.The European majors(especially Shell and Repsol)have made far more progress than their American counterparts(such as Chevron,ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips),while national oil companies(such as Pemex,Lukoil and CNPC)are more constrained in their ability to diversify,often due to more stringent government policies and regulatory frameworks.In 2018,the majors sampled invested $6.6bn in renewables,equivalent to roughly 3% of their combined capex budges.Typically,companies with larger oil reserves were less diversified in renewable energy,says the report.The oil and gas majors commonly focus on renewable investment in wind and solartechnologies,while very few have stakes in hydroelectric and geothermal energy sources.Key drivers for the transition were the declining costs of renewables,investor and customer pressure(which threatens to damage corporate brands)and government regulations,alongside a new risk allocation strategy,given oil price volatility and the strong geopolitical risk related to traditional oil and gas production.
机译:根据研究咨询CMS委托的新报告,能源过渡的步伐在15个领先的国际石油和天然气公司中有所不同。作为雪佛龙,埃克森美孚和康诺菲利普斯),而国家石油公司(如Pemex,Lukoil和CNPC)在他们多元化的能力中受到更加约束,往往是由于更严格的政府政策和监管框架。在2018年,专业被抽样投资66亿美元在可再生能源中,相当于其合并的支出比例的大约3%。报告称,具有较大石油储量的公司在可再生能源中较少多样化。石油和天然气专业普遍关注风和唯一的可再生投资在水力发电和地热能源源中有股权。过渡的司机是可再生能源,投资者和Custo的降价下降MER压力(威胁要损害企业品牌)和政府法规,以及新的风险分配战略,鉴于石油价格波动和与传统石油和天然气生产相关的强大地缘政治风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号