...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: Development and cross-cultural evaluation
【24h】

A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: Development and cross-cultural evaluation

机译:生命结短年度晚期癌症患者的问题及时提示列表:发展和跨文化评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Clinicians and patients find prognosis and end-of-life care discussions challenging. Misunderstanding one's prognosis can contribute to poor decision-making and end-of-life quality of life. A question prompt list (booklet of questions patients can ask clinicians) targeting these issues may help overcome communication barriers. None exists for end-of-life discussions outside the palliative care setting. Aim: To develop/pilot a question prompt list facilitating discussion/planning of end-of-life care for oncology patients with advanced cancer from Australia and the United States and to explore acceptability, perceived benefits/challenges of using the question prompt list, suggestions for improvements and the necessity of country-specific adaptations. Design: An expert panel developed a question prompt list targeting prognosis and end-of-life issues. Australian/US semi-structured interviews and one focus group elicited feedback about the question prompt list. Transcribed data were analysed using qualitative methods. Setting/participants: Thirty-four patients with advanced cancer (15 Australian/19 US) and 13 health professionals treating such patients (7 Australian/6 US) from two Australian and one US cancer centre participated. Results: Most endorsed the entire question prompt list, though a minority queried the utility/appropriateness of some questions. Analysis identified four global themes: (1) reinforcement of known benefits of question prompt lists, (2) appraisal of content and suggestions for further developments, (3) perceived benefits and challenges in using the question prompt list and (4) contrasts in Australian/US feedback. These contrasts necessitated distinct Australian/US final versions of the question prompt list. Conclusions: Participants endorsed the question prompt list as acceptable and useful. Feedback resulted in two distinct versions of the question prompt list, accommodating differences between Australian and US approaches to end-of-life discussions, highlighting the appropriateness of tailoring communication aides to individual populations.
机译:背景:临床医生和患者发现预后和终身保健讨论具有挑战性。误解一个人的预后可以促进差的决策和生活结束生活质量。一个问题提示清单(询问患者的小册子可以询问临床医生)目标这些问题可能有助于克服通信障碍。没有存在姑息治疗环境之外的生活结束讨论。目标:发展/试点问题提示列表促进澳大利亚和美国先进癌症的肿瘤学患者的讨论/规划肿瘤患者,并探索使用问题提示列表的可接受性,感知利益/挑战,建议为了改善和国家特定适应的必要性。设计:专家面板开发了一个问题提示列表,其定位预后和生活终止问题。澳大利亚/美国半结构化访谈和一个焦点小组引发了有关问题提示列表的反馈。使用定性方法分析转录数据。设定/参与者:三十四名晚期癌症晚期患者(15澳洲/ 19美国)和13名卫生专业人员,治疗来自两个澳大利亚和一家美国癌症中心的患者(7澳洲/ 6美国)。结果:最批准整个问题提示列表,尽管少数群体查询了一些问题的实用/适当性。分析确定了四个全球主题:(1)强化问题提示清单的已知效益,(2)对进一步发展的内容和建议进行评估,(3)在使用问题促销列表和澳大利亚的对比中感知福利和挑战/美国反馈。这些对比需要有问题的澳大利亚/美国最终版本的问题提示列表。结论:参与者将问题提示列表批准可接受和有用。反馈导致了两个不同版本的问题提示列表,适应澳大利亚和美国对生活结束讨论的差异,突出了对个别群体定制沟通助手的适当性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Palliative medicine 》 |2013年第8期| 共10页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED) School of Psychology;

    University of Rochester Medical Centre University of Rochester Rochester NY United States;

    Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED) School of Psychology;

    Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED) School of Psychology;

    Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED) School of Psychology;

    Cardiovascular and Chronic Care Centre Curtin University of Technology Sydney NSW Australia;

    Sydney School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia;

    University of Rochester Medical Centre University of Rochester Rochester NY United States;

    University of Rochester Medical Centre University of Rochester Rochester NY United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学 ;
  • 关键词

    advanced cancer; communication; cross-cultural comparison; qualitative research; Question prompt list; terminal care;

    机译:高级癌症;沟通;跨文化比较;定性研究;问题提示列表;终端护理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号