...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: Development and cross-cultural evaluation
【24h】

A question prompt list for patients with advanced cancer in the final year of life: Development and cross-cultural evaluation

机译:生命最后一年中晚期癌症患者的问题提示列表:发展和跨文化评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Clinicians and patients find prognosis and end-of-life care discussions challenging. Misunderstanding one's prognosis can contribute to poor decision-making and end-of-life quality of life. A question prompt list (booklet of questions patients can ask clinicians) targeting these issues may help overcome communication barriers. None exists for end-of-life discussions outside the palliative care setting. Aim: To develop/pilot a question prompt list facilitating discussion/planning of end-of-life care for oncology patients with advanced cancer from Australia and the United States and to explore acceptability, perceived benefits/challenges of using the question prompt list, suggestions for improvements and the necessity of country-specific adaptations. Design: An expert panel developed a question prompt list targeting prognosis and end-of-life issues. Australian/US semi-structured interviews and one focus group elicited feedback about the question prompt list. Transcribed data were analysed using qualitative methods. Setting/participants: Thirty-four patients with advanced cancer (15 Australian/19 US) and 13 health professionals treating such patients (7 Australian/6 US) from two Australian and one US cancer centre participated. Results: Most endorsed the entire question prompt list, though a minority queried the utility/appropriateness of some questions. Analysis identified four global themes: (1) reinforcement of known benefits of question prompt lists, (2) appraisal of content and suggestions for further developments, (3) perceived benefits and challenges in using the question prompt list and (4) contrasts in Australian/US feedback. These contrasts necessitated distinct Australian/US final versions of the question prompt list. Conclusions: Participants endorsed the question prompt list as acceptable and useful. Feedback resulted in two distinct versions of the question prompt list, accommodating differences between Australian and US approaches to end-of-life discussions, highlighting the appropriateness of tailoring communication aides to individual populations.
机译:背景:临床医生和患者发现预后和临终护理讨论充满挑战。对预后的误解会导致决策不力和生命终止。针对这些问题的问题提示列表(患者可以向临床医生提问的小册子)可能有助于克服沟通障碍。对于姑息治疗之外的生命终结讨论,则一无所有。目的:制定/试行问题提示列表,以促进讨论/规划来自澳大利亚和美国的晚期癌症肿瘤患者的临终护理,并探讨使用问题提示列表的可接受性,感知的收益/挑战,建议改进和针对特定国家进行适应的必要性。设计:专家小组制定了针对预后和寿命终止问题的问题提示列表。澳大利亚/美国的半结构化访谈和一个焦点小组就问题提示列表征求了反馈。使用定性方法分析转录数据。机构/参与者:来自两个澳大利亚和一个美国癌症中心的34名晚期癌症患者(15例澳大利亚人/ 19个美国)和13名医护人员治疗了此类患者(7例澳大利亚人/ 6美国)。结果:大多数人支持整个问题提示列表,尽管少数人质疑某些问题的实用性/适当性。分析确定了四个全球主题:(1)增强问题提示列表的已知优势;(2)评估内容和进一步发展的建议;(3)使用问题提示列表的感知优势和挑战;(4)澳大利亚的对比/ US反馈。这些对比使问题提示列表的澳大利亚/美国最终版本有所不同。结论:参与者认可问题提示列表是可接受的和有用的。反馈产生了问题提示列表的两个不同版本,适应了澳大利亚和美国的生命周期讨论方法之间的差异,强调了针对个别人群量身定制交流助手的适当性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号