首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Video consultations in palliative care: A systematic integrative review
【24h】

Video consultations in palliative care: A systematic integrative review

机译:姑息治疗中的视频咨询:系统综合评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: There is extensive need for palliative care worldwide, but access to care remains inadequate, especially for non-cancer patients. Video consultations are a promising tool in the provision of home-based palliative care, but an overview of evidence solely on video consultations in palliative care is lacking. Aim: To review and synthesize current evidence regarding the use of video consultations in general and specialized palliative care to various patient groups. Design: A systematic integrative review with a narrative synthesis was undertaken in accordance with PRISMA (2009) guidelines. PROSPERO #: CRD42018095383 Data sources: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for primary research articles published between 2005 and 2018. In addition, reference lists of included articles were hand searched. Results: The search resulted in 813 articles; 39 articles were included in the review, consisting of mixed methods (n = 14), qualitative (n = 10), quantitative (n = 10), and case studies (n = 5). The studies mainly focused on specialized palliative care to adult patients with cancer in high income countries. Through data analysis, six themes addressing advantages/disadvantages and facilitators/barriers were identified: (1) Redesign of care, (2) Communication, (3) User perceptions, (4) Technology, (5) Privacy issues, and (6) Economic implications. Conclusion: Using video technology in palliative care has both advantages and disadvantages. However, evidence beyond the focus on specialized palliative care and patients with cancer is limited. Future research should focus on how and when video consultations might replace in-person specialized palliative care and video consultations in general palliative care, in low and middle income countries; and involve patients with a non-cancer diagnosis.
机译:背景:全世界姑息治疗广泛需求,但护理仍然不足,特别是对于非癌症患者。视频咨询是提供基于家庭的姑息治疗的有希望的工具,但仅缺乏对姑息治疗中的视频咨询的证据概述。目的:审查和综合有关使用视频咨询的当前证据,以及对各种患者群体的专业姑息治疗。设计:根据PRISMA(2009年)指南,进行了系统性综合审查。 Prospero#:CRD42018095383数据来源:在2005年至2018年期间出版的主要研究文章搜索了PubMed,Embase,Cinahl和Psychinfo。此外,还有所删除的文章的参考列表。结果:搜索导致813篇文章;审查中包含39制品,由混合方法(n = 14),定性(n = 10),定量(n = 10)和案例研究(n = 5)组成。研究主要集中在高收入国家的成人患者的专业姑息治疗。通过数据分析,确定了六个主题,解决了优缺点和促进者/障碍:(1)重新设计护理,(2)沟通,(3)用户认知,(4)技术,(5)隐私问题,(6)经济影响。结论:在姑息治疗中使用视频技术具有优缺点。然而,超出专注于专业姑息治疗和癌症患者的证据有限。未来的研究应侧重于视频咨询如何以及当普通姑息治疗中替代群体专业的姑息护理和视频咨询,中低收入和中等收入国家;并涉及患有非癌症诊断的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号