首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale
【24h】

Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale

机译:儿科急诊部中使用3个疼痛尺度的心理测量特性的比较:视觉模拟量表,面临疼痛规模修订和彩色模拟量表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appropriate pain measurement relies on the use of valid, reliable tools. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the psychometric properties of 3 self-reported pain scales commonly used in the pediatric emergency department (ED). The inclusion criteria were children aged 6 to 17 years presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal injury and self-reported pain scores = 30 mm on the mechanical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Self-reported pain intensity was assessed using the mechanical VAS, Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), and Colour Analogue Scale (CAS). Convergent validity was assessed by Pearson correlations and the Bland-Altman method; responsiveness to change was assessed using paired sample t tests and standardized mean responses; and reliability was estimated using relative and absolute indices. A total of 456 participants were included, with a mean age of 11.9 years +/- 2.7 and a majority were boys (252/456, 55.3%). Correlations between each pair of scales were 0.78 (VAS/FPS-R), 0.92 (VAS/CAS), and 0.79 (CAS/FPS-R). Limits of agreement (95% confidence interval) were -3.77 to 2.33 (VAS/FPS-R), -1.74 to 1.75 (VAS/CAS), and -2.21 to 3.62 (CAS/FPS-R). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated by significant differences in mean pain scores among the scales (P 0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of repeatability estimates suggested acceptable reliability for the 3 scales at, respectively, 0.79 and +/- 2.29 (VAS), 0.82 and +/- 2.07 (CAS), and 0.76 and +/- 2.82 (FPS-R). The scales demonstrated good psychometric properties for children with acute pain in the ED. The VAS and CAS showed a strong convergent validity, whereas FPS-R was not in agreement with the other scales.
机译:适当的疼痛测量依赖于使用有效,可靠的工具。本研究的目的是确定并比较常用于儿科急诊部(ED)的3个自我报告的疼痛尺度的心理测量特性。纳入标准是6至17岁的儿童呈现给ED,肌肉骨骼损伤和自我报告的疼痛评分& = 30毫米机械视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用机械VAS评估自我报告的疼痛强度,面向疼痛规模修正(FPS-R)和颜色模拟量表(CAS)。通过Pearson相关性和Bland-Altman方法评估会聚有效性;使用配对样本T测试和标准化的平均反应评估对变化的响应性;使用相对和绝对指数估计可靠性。共有456名参与者,平均年龄为11.9岁+/- 2.7,大多数是男孩(252/456,55.3%)。每对刻度之间的相关性为0.78(VAS / FPS-R),0.92(VAS / CAS)和0.79(CAS / FPS-R)。协议的限制(95%置信区间)为-3.77至2.33(VAS / FPS-R),-1.74至1.75(VAS / CAS)和-2.21至3.62(CAS / FPS-R)。通过尺度之间的平均疼痛评分的显着差异来证明对变革的响应性(P <0.0001)。脑内相关系数和重复性系数估计,3种尺度分别在0.79和+/- 2.29(VAS),0.82和+/- 2.07(CAS)和0.76和+/- 2.82(FPS-R)的可接受可靠性)。鳞片表现出患有急性疼痛的儿童的良好心理测量性质。 VAS和CAS显示出强烈的会聚有效性,而FPS-R并非与其他尺度一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号