体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表用于术后疼痛评估的比较

摘要

目的:通过体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表对术后患者急性疼痛评估的比较,探讨使用体感诱发电位刺激仪进行术后疼痛的评估的可行性.方法:观察美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ～Ⅱ级的手术后患者155例,年龄18 ～ 72岁,分别用体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表对术后患者的急性疼痛进行评估,用SPSS 11.0软件对测得的数据进行统计学分析.结果:体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表的相关系数为0.635 (P＜ 0.001),两者存在显著正相关关系.结论:体感诱发电位刺激仪和视觉模拟量表有较好的相关性,体感诱发电位刺激仪可用于疼痛评估,有较好的临床应用前景.%Objective To compare the validity of the evoked response electrical stimulator (ERES) with visual analog scale (VAS) in analyzing pain intensity in postoperative patients. Methods 155 patients with ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ grade, aged 18-72 years, were followed-up within day 1 -3 after surgery. The pain intensity evaluated by ERES and VAS in postoperative patients were recorded. Results There was a significant correlation between VAS and PD in the two groups, the respective coefficient of correlation was 0.635 (P < 0.001). Conclusion There was a well correlation between VAS and ERES in the pain assessment in postoperative patients. It is feasible for ERES to assess pain intensity in postoperative patients.