首页> 外文期刊>Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere: The Journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life >Hidden Concepts in the History and Philosophy of Origins-of-Life Studies: a Workshop Report
【24h】

Hidden Concepts in the History and Philosophy of Origins-of-Life Studies: a Workshop Report

机译:历史和哲学历史和哲学的隐藏概念:研讨会报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this review, we describe some of the central philosophical issues facing origins-of-life research and provide a targeted history of the developments that have led to the multidisciplinary field of origins-of-life studies. We outline these issues and developments to guide researchers and students from all fields. With respect to philosophy, we provide brief summaries of debates with respect to (1) definitions (or theories) of life, what life is and how research should be conducted in the absence of an accepted theory of life, (2) the distinctions between synthetic, historical, and universal projects in origins-of-life studies, issues with strategies for inferring the origins of life, such as (3) the nature of the first living entities (the "bottom up" approach) and (4) how to infer the nature of the last universal common ancestor (the "top down" approach), and (5) the status of origins of life as a science. Each of these debates influences the others. Although there are clusters of researchers that agree on some answers to these issues, each of these debates is still open. With respect to history, we outline several independent paths that have led to some of the approaches now prevalent in origins-of-life studies. These include one path from early views of life through the scientific revolutions brought about by Linnaeus (von Linn.), Wohler, Miller, and others. In this approach, new theories, tools, and evidence guide new thoughts about the nature of life and its origin. We also describe another family of paths motivated by a" circularity" approach to life, which is guided by such thinkers as Maturana & Varela, Ganti, Rosen, and others. These views echo ideas developed by Kant and Aristotle, though they do so using modern science in ways that produce exciting avenues of investigation. By exploring the history of these ideas, we can see how many of the issues that currently interest us have been guided by the contexts in which the ideas were developed. The discipli
机译:在这篇综述中,我们描述了一些面临着生命研究的中央哲学问题,并提供了导致生命研究的多学科领域的有针对性的发展历史。我们概述了这些问题和发展,从而指导了所有领域的研究人员和学生。关于哲学,我们提供关于(1)生命的定义(或理论)的辩论的简要概述,在没有接受的生命理论的情况下,应该如何进行生活以及如何进行研究,(2)之间的区别始终生活研究的综合,历史和普遍项目,推断生命起源的策略问题,如(3)第一个生活实体的性质(“自下而上”方法)和(4)如何推断上次普遍共同的祖先的性质(“排名前后”方法),(5)生命的起源作为科学的地位。这些辩论中的每一个都影响其他辩论。虽然有关于这些问题的一些答案的研究人员的集群,但这些辩论仍然是开放的。关于历史,我们概述了几个独立的路径,这些路径导致了几个普遍研究的方法。这些包括通过Linnaeus(von Linn。),Wohler,Miller等人的科学革命从生命的早期观点中的一条路径。在这种方法中,新的理论,工具和证据指导了关于生命本质及其起源的新思路。我们还描述了另一个受“循环”生活方式的道路系列,这是由这样的思想家作为Maturana&Varela,Ganti,Rosen等的人指导。这些观点回应了康德和亚里士多德开发的想法,尽管他们这样做的是使用现代科学,以产生令人兴奋的调查途径。通过探索这些想法的历史,我们可以了解当前利益的问题是如何由制定思想的背景引导的。学科

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号