首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Who's Winning the Public Process? How to Use Public Documents to Assess the Equity, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Stakeholder Engagement
【24h】

Who's Winning the Public Process? How to Use Public Documents to Assess the Equity, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Stakeholder Engagement

机译:谁赢得了公共过程? 如何使用公共文件来评估利益相关者参与的股权,效率和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is widely recognized that stakeholder engagement processes produce advantages, but few studies acknowledge that they also can produce disadvantages. There is a global need to better assess stakeholder engagement processes by defining success and developing new methods to analyze stakeholder participation data. Our method of digitizing and coding stakeholder communications (1) produces a wide range of analyses, (2) tells the story of governance over time, (3) is comparable with other datasets, and (4) can be used wherever public documents exist. We demonstrate the utility of these integrated methods by examining statewide differences in public participation and success rates in Alaska's Board of Fisheries' (Board) proposal process. We determine that significantly different participation and success rates across the state indicate the existence of disadvantages and the need for further investigation into the equity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the Board process.
机译:众所周知,利益相关者参与过程产生优势,但很少有研究承认他们也可以产生缺点。 全球需要通过确定成功和开发分析利益相关者参与数据的新方法来更好地评估利益相关方参与流程。 我们的数字化和编码利益相关者通信(1)产生了广泛的分析,(2)讲述了治理的故事随着时间的推移,(3)与其他数据集相当,并且(4)可以在公共文件存在的地方使用。 我们通过在阿拉斯加渔业委员会(董事会)提案进程中的公共参与和成功率的全态差异来证明这些综合方法的效用。 我们确定整个国家的显着不同的参与和成功率表明存在缺点,需要进一步调查董事会进程的股权,效率和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号