首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in cell and developmental biology >Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization
【24h】

Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization

机译:关于遗传调配的解构思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The concept of genetic canalization has had an abiding influence on views of complex-trait evolution. A genetically canalized system has evolved to become less sensitive to the effects of mutation. When a gene product that supports canalization is compromised, the phenotypic impacts of a mutation should be more pronounced. This expected increase in mutational effects not only has important consequences for evolution, but has also motivated strategies to treat disease. However, recent studies demonstrate that, when putative agents of genetic canalization are impaired, systems do not behave as expected. Here, we review the evidence that is used to infer whether particular gene products are agents of genetic canalization. Then we explain how such inferences often succumb to a converse error. We go on to show that several candidate agents of genetic canalization increase the phenotypic impacts of some mutations while decreasing the phenotypic impacts of others. These observations suggest that whether a gene product acts as a 'buffer' (lessening mutational effects) or a 'potentiator' (increasing mutational effects) is not a fixed property of the gene product but instead differs for the different mutations with which it interacts. To investigate features of genetic interactions that might predispose them toward buffering versus potentiation, we explore simulated gene-regulatory networks. Similarly to putative agents of genetic canalization, the gene products in simulated networks also modify the phenotypic effects of mutations in other genes without a strong overall tendency towards lessening or increasing these effects. In sum, these observations call into question whether complex traits have evolved to become less sensitive (i.e., are canalized) to genetic change, and the degree to which trends exist that predict how one genetic change might alter another's impact. We conclude by discussing approaches to address these and other open questions that are brought into focus
机译:遗传分配的概念对复杂特质演化的看法具有持久的影响。基因分流系统已经进化以对突变的影响变得不太敏感。当支持钙化的基因产物受到损害时,突变的表型撞击应更加明显。这种预期的突变效应的增加不仅对演变具有重要影响,而且还具有治疗疾病的策略。然而,最近的研究表明,当遗传调情受损时,系统不按预期表现。在这里,我们审查了用于推断特定基因产物是否是遗传源性的药剂的证据。然后我们解释这种推断如何往往会屈服于逆机错误。我们继续表明,遗传遗传化的几种候选药物增加了一些突变的表型影响,同时降低了他人的表型影响。这些观察结果表明,基因产物是否充当“缓冲液”(减少突变效应)或“增强剂”(增加的突变效应)不是基因产物的固定性质,而是不同于其相互作用的不同突变的不同。为了调查可能使他们倾向于缓冲与潜力的遗传相互作用的特征,我们探讨了模拟基因监管网络。与遗传分配的推定剂类似,模拟网络中的基因产物也在没有强大的整体趋势减少或增加这些效果的情况下改变突变的表型效应。总而言之,这些观察结果调查了复杂的特征是否已经进化以变得不那么敏感(即,被分配)到遗传变化,并且存在趋势所存在的程度,预测一个遗传变化可能会改变另一个遗传变化的影响。我们通过讨论解决焦点的方法和其他开放问题的方法来结束

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号