...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. >Validity of histology for the diagnosis of paediatric coeliac disease: a Swedish multicentre study
【24h】

Validity of histology for the diagnosis of paediatric coeliac disease: a Swedish multicentre study

机译:儿科腹菌病诊断组织学的有效性:瑞典多期学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective Histological evaluation of intestinal biopsies for the diagnosis of coeliac disease can be challenging and compatible with risk of misdiagnosis. The aim was to evaluate the agreement of pathological diagnosis for coeliac disease in children investigated at four major paediatric university hospitals in Sweden. Materials and methods Intestinal duodenal biopsies were collected from 402 children at median 9.7 years (1.4-18.3 years). A pathologist at each hospital performed the primary evaluation. A designated pathologist, blinded to the primary evaluation, performed a second Marsh classification of biopsies (M0 to M3c) taken from the bulb and duodenum separately. Kappa () scores between first and second evaluation determined the agreement. Plasma samples were collected at the day of intestinal biopsy and analysed for tissue transglutaminase autoantibodies (tTGA) using radioligand-binding assays. Results Marsh scores were concordant in 229/356 biopsies (64%, =0.52, p<0.0001). Among discordant results, 15/127 (12%) showed M0 in distal duodenum but M2 in the bulb, whereas the opposite was true for 8/127 (6%) of the biopsies. There were fewer collected duodenal biopsies, more missing bulb biopsies and missing CD3 staining among discordant evaluations. The second evaluation revealed a Marsh score compliant with coeliac disease in 22 children of whom seven children were tTGA positive. Conclusions The variation between university hospitals on the pathological evaluation of biopsies may lead to misdiagnosis of coeliac disease in paediatric patients. Access to clinical and endoscopic information as well as tTGA levels may be useful for the pathologist to complement the evaluation in dubious cases.
机译:目的对腹菌病诊断的肠道活组织检查的客观组织学评价可能是挑战性的,与误诊的风险相容。目的是评估在瑞典四大小儿科大学医院调查儿童腹腔病病理诊断的病理诊断协议。材料和方法在902名儿童中位于9.7岁(1.4-18.3岁)中收集肠道十二指肠活组织检查。每家医院的病理学家都进行了初级评价。指定的病理学家蒙蔽了初级评价,对从灯泡和十二指肠分别取出的活检(M0至M3C)的第二沼泽分类。 kappa()在第一和第二次评估之间的分数确定了协议。在肠道活检日收集等离子体样品,并使用放射性配体结合测定分析组织转谷氨酰胺酶自身抗体(TTGA)。结果229/356活检(64%,= 0.52,P <0.0001),Marsh分数均匀合作。在不间断的结果中,15/127(12%)在远端十二指肠中显示M0,但灯泡中的M2,而相反的是8/127(6%)的活组织检查。收集的十二指肠活组织检查较少,更缺少的灯泡活组织检查和缺少CD3染色之间的不间讨论评估。第二种评价揭示了符合乳腺疾病的沼泽评分,其中22名儿童患有TTGA阳性。结论大学医院对活检病理评价的变化可能导致小儿患者乳糜泻的误诊。获得临床和内窥镜信息以及TTGA水平可能对病理学家有用,以补充可疑病例的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号