首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Aerospace >Evaluation of Workload and Performance during Primary Flight Training with Motion Cueing Seat in an Advanced Aviation Training Device
【24h】

Evaluation of Workload and Performance during Primary Flight Training with Motion Cueing Seat in an Advanced Aviation Training Device

机译:高级航空训练装置中初级飞行训练中的工作量和性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of simulation is a long-standing industry standard at every level of flight training. Historically, given the acquisition and maintenance costs associated with such equipment, full-motion devices have been reserved for advanced corporate and airline training programs. The Motion Cueing Seat (MCS) is a relatively inexpensive alternative to full-motion flight simulators and has the potential to enhance the fixed-base flight simulation in primary flight training. In this article, we discuss the results of an evaluation of the effect of motion cueing on pilot workload and performance during primary instrument training. Twenty flight students and instructors from a collegiate flight training program participated in the study. Each participant performed three runs of a basic circuit using a fixed-base Advanced Aviation Training Device (AATD) and an MCS. Flight data was analyzed in terms of a workload parameter as the product of pilot input and the deviation from a reference attitude or heading and performance as the deviation from a desired altitude or heading. Friedman ANOVA tests were used to determine the significance of differences in the parameters between the trials. Where the Friedman test indicated significance, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The results of the ANOVA tests were mixed. Few of the metrics were found to have statistically significant changes across the three trials during various phases of a flight. Where the changes were found to be significant between the comparisons (Seat ON#1-Seat OFF-Seat ON#2), it appeared that the MCS had a measurable effect and suggested a potential improvement in fixed-base flight simulation in primary flight training. Additional research across a greater span of maneuvers and training time, considering such human factors as training and fatigue, may yield greater and more nuanced insights into the benefits of MCS in primary flight training.
机译:在各种级别的飞行训练中,使用模拟是一种长期行业标准。从历史上看,鉴于与此类设备相关的收购和维护成本,为先进的公司和航空公司培训计划保留了全动动量设备。运动提示座(MCS)是对全运动飞行模拟器的相对便宜的替代方案,并且具有提高初级飞行训练中的固定基地飞行模拟的可能性。在本文中,我们讨论了在主要仪器训练期间对动作提示对动作对试验工作量和性能影响的评估结果。来自大学飞行培训计划的二十个飞行学生和教师参加了该研究。每个参与者使用固定基础高级航空训练设备(AATD)和MCS执行三次基本电路。在工作负载参数中分析了飞行数据作为试点输入的乘积和与参考姿态或标题和性能的偏差,作为与所需高度或标题的偏差。 Friedman Anova测试用于确定试验之间参数差异的重要性。在弗里德曼测试表明意义的情况下,HOC对比较是用Bonferroni校正进行多重比较进行的。混合ANOVA测试的结果。在飞行的各个阶段,在三次试验中发现了很少的指标在统计​​上具有统计学意义的变化。在比较之间发现变化是显着的(在#2的#1座位上的座位上的座位上),似乎MCS具有可测量的效果,并建议在初级飞行训练中的固定基地飞行模拟潜在改善。考虑到这种人类因素作为培训和疲劳,越来越多的机动和培训时间的额外研究可能会产生更大和更细致的洞察力在主要飞行训练中的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号