首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >A systems approach to risk analysis validation for risk management
【24h】

A systems approach to risk analysis validation for risk management

机译:风险管理风险分析验证的系统方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a logical structure to address the topic of this special issue: Risk Analysis Validation and Trust in Risk Management. We do that by presenting a systems approach that links all four of those concepts. The underlying logic: Validation should test how effectively a risk analysis supports actual, real-world implemented risk management. Our approach is based on a flowchart linking all of the elements from inputs through risk analysis, risk reporting and transparency, then how that reporting-transparency support the risk management decision making process and associated third party and stakeholder reviews (formal or informal), which in turn determine the trust and acceptance necessary for the real-world implementation of risk management actions. We take that flowchart and identify within it sixteen critical elements, then specify a validation test for each of those elements. Validation, then, consists of subjecting the risk analysis to those sixteen tests. Those tests, together, test the risk analysis for how effectively it supports implemented risk management. Another key feature: We divide the flowchart into Analysts' Domain, Users' Domain, and Analysis Community Domain. The Analysts' Domain is where the risk analysts work, then the Users' Domain stands between their work and implementation. The Analysis Community Domain is comprised of the communities of risk analysts and commissioners of risk analyses. Those two communities are where we would, as part of building our systems approach to risk analysis validation, build a "Culture of Analysis Quality," where the sixteen validation tests would be enforced by both of those communities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了解决本特别问题主题的逻辑结构:风险分析验证和风险管理信任。我们通过呈现链接所有四个概念的系统方法来这样做。基础逻辑:验证应该测试风险分析如何支持实际,现实世界的风险管理。我们的方法是基于通过风险分析,风险报告和透明度链接所有元素的流程图,然后该报告 - 透明度如何支持风险管理决策过程和相关的第三方和利益相关方评论(正式或非正式)反过来决定了现实世界实施风险管理行为所需的信任和接受。我们拍摄了该流程图并在其中确定了十六个关键元素,然后为每个元素指定验证测试。然后,验证包括对十六个测试进行风险分析。这些测试在一起,测试风险分析,了解它支持实施风险管理的有效性。另一个关键功能:我们将流程图划分为分析师域,用户的域和分析社区域。分析师的域名是风险分析师的工作,然后用户的域名代表他们的工作和实现。分析界域由风险分析师和风险分析专员的社区组成。这两个社区是我们将在建立风险分析验证的系统方法的一部分,建立“分析质量文化”的一部分,其中十六个验证测试将由这两个社区执行。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号