...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Chronic Hypertension: Effect of Blood Pressure Control on Pregnancy Outcome
【24h】

Chronic Hypertension: Effect of Blood Pressure Control on Pregnancy Outcome

机译:慢性高血压:血压控制对妊娠结局的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Chronic hypertension (cHTN) complicates 1% to 2% of pregnancies. In these pregnancies, there is a 10-fold increase in the risk of preeclampsia (PE) and 2-fold increase in risk of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. The current recommendation for patients with cHTN is that severe hypertension should be controlled to reduce the risk of maternal death and morbidity, but in the case of mild to moderate hypertension, it is not known whether normalizing blood pressure (BP) is beneficial and whether it reduces the risk of PE and SGA. This study examined whether controlling BP in patients with mild to moderate cHTN during pregnancy has a beneficial or adverse effect on PE or SGA risk. The researchers performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of patients with mild to moderate cHTN in pregnancy that reported the effects of different levels of BP control on PE or SGA risk, including trials that compared treatment versus no treatment or versus placebo, in which control of BP after randomization was documented. Studies including women with gestational hypertension and cHTN were excluded unless they reported data separately for cHTN. The outcome measures for this analysis were superimposed PE and SGA. The researchers reviewed these outcome measures in relation to the level of BP control, defined as the difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) after enrollment between the treated group and the controls. Six trials including 495 participants provided data on BP after entry to the study. Four studies compared antihypertensive agents to no treatment, and 2 studies compared antihypertensive agents to placebo. All trials were conducted between 1976 and 1990 and were considered to have a high risk of bias. There was high heterogeneity between studies for MAP after randomization (I~2 = 87%) and for SGA (I~2 = 60%), but not for PE (I~2 = 0%). There were large differences between studies in the inclusion criteria, antihypertensive regimens, targets of therapy, and gestational age range at entry to the trials. In women receiving antihypertensive therapy, compared with those receiving placebo or no treatment, the MAP after entry to the trial was significantly lower (mean difference, -4.2 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.6 to -1.8; P = 0.006). However, there was no significant reduction in the risk of PE (relative risk [RR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.63-1.68; P = 0.90) or SGA (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.35-2.93; P = 0.99). The results suggest that lowering the MAP with antihypertensive medication in women with mild to moderate cHTN has no significant effect on PE or SGA risk. This study also found that the effect of antihypertensive medication in terms of lowering BP was significant but very small and that, in most trials, the average BP in the placebo or no treatment group was less than 140/90 mm Hg. The researchers acknowledge that the meta-analysis included a small number of trials with large heterogeneity and that the age of the studies may limit the conclusion because medical practice regarding care of these patients could have changed in the years since publication of the original trials. They recommend that future studies examine the impact of CH normalization of BP before conception and whether this approach would improve placentation and/or cardiovascular function and thereby prevent PE and SGA.
机译:慢性高血压(CHTN)复杂1%至2%的怀孕。在这些怀孕中,预口度(PE)的风险增加了10倍,妊娠龄(SGA)新生儿的危险风险的2倍。目前对CHTN患者的推荐是严重的高血压应控制,以降低母体死亡和发病率的风险,但在轻度到中度高血压的情况下,尚不清楚标准化血压(BP)是有益的吗?是否有益降低PE和SGA的风险。本研究检测了在妊娠期间轻度到中度CHTN患者的控制BP是否对PE或SGA风险有益或不良影响。研究人员对妊娠轻微的患者的随机对照试验进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,妊娠中适度的CHTN适度的CHTN对PP或SGA风险的不同水平对患者的影响,包括比较治疗的试验,而不是任何治疗或与安慰剂,其中记录了随机化后对BP的控制。除非他们分别报告CHTN的数据,否则包括妊娠高血压和CHTN的妇女的研究。该分析的结果措施是PE和SGA的叠加。研究人员审查了与BP对照水平相关的这些结果措施,定义为在治疗组和对照组之间注册后平均动脉压(MAP)的差异。六项试验包括495名参与者在进入研究后提供了关于BP的数据。四项研究比较抗高血压剂未治疗,2项研究将抗高血压剂与安慰剂进行比较。所有试验均在1976年至1990年间进行,被认为具有高偏倚风险。在随机化后的地图(I〜2 = 87%)和SGA(I〜2 = 60%)之间存在高异质性(I〜2 = 60%),但不适用于PE(I〜2 = 0%)。在入门标准,抗高血压方案,治疗靶点和妊娠期进入试验时,研究之间存在巨大差异。在接受抗高血压治疗的妇女中,与接受安慰剂或没有治疗相比,进入试验后的地图显着降低(平均差异,-4.2mm Hg; 95%置信区间[CI],-6.6至-1.8; P = 0.006)。然而,PE的风险没有显着降低(相对风险[RR],1.03; 95%CI,0.63-1.68; P = 0.90)或SGA(RR,1.01; 95%CI,0.35-2.93; P = 0.99)。结果表明,降低含有轻度至中度CHTN的抗高血压药物的地图对PE或SGA风险没有显着影响。本研究还发现,降压药物在降低BP方面的影响显着但非常小,并且在大多数试验中,安慰剂或未治疗组的平均BP小于140/90mm Hg。研究人员承认,Meta分析包括少数具有大异质性的试验,并且研究的年龄可能限制得出结论,因为关于这些患者的护理医疗实践在原始试验的出版后可能发生了变化。他们建议未来的研究检查概念前对BP的CH标准化的影响以及这种方法是否会改善咬合和/或心血管功能,从而防止PE和SGA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号