...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Salvage focal and salvage total cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy
【24h】

Salvage focal and salvage total cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy

机译:原发放疗后局部复发性前列腺癌的抢救灶和抢救总冷冻消融术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives To present the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage focal (SFC) and salvage total (STC) cryoablation for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after failed primary radiotherapy. Patients and Methods From March 2003 to August 2010, 50 men with biopsy-proven unilateral (n = 25) or bilateral (n = 25) radio-recurrent PCa underwent SFC or STC, respectively. Patients were assessed after treatment by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, transrectal ultrasonography, biopsy and questionnaires. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined using the Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2 mg/mL). Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Results The median pre-cryoablation PSA level and Gleason score were, respectively, 2.8 ng/mL and 7 for SFC, and 3.9 ng/mL and 7 for STC. The median follow-up was 31 and 53 months (P = 0.004) for SFC and STC, respectively. Oncological outcomes were as follows: no patient died; one patient who underwent STC developed bone metastases; eight patients who underwent SFC and three who underwent STC had BF and the 5-year BF-free survival rates were 54 and 86%, respectively. In those patients without BF, the mean PSA decreased by 86% for SFC and 90% for STC within the first year and remained stable. Functional outcomes were as follows: new onset urinary incontinence occurred in three (13%) patients in the STC group, whereas no patient in the SFC group developed incontinence (P = 0.10); Two of seven patients in the SFC group retained postoperative potency, but none of the four potent patients in the STC group recovered potency postoperatively (P = 0.48); one (4%) patient in the STC group developed a recto-urethral fistula, but none occurred in the SFC group (P = 0.48). Conclusions SFC and STC are feasible and safe with acceptable mid-term oncological outcomes. For carefully selected patients, SFC is an option that could be associated with lower treatment-related morbidity compared with STC. Although longer follow-up and more patient numbers are needed, our initial oncological and functional outcomes of SFC and STC are encouraging.
机译:目的介绍原发放疗失败后复发性前列腺癌(PCa)的抢救灶(SFC)和抢救总量(STC)冷冻消融的肿瘤学和功能结局。患者和方法从2003年3月至2010年8月,分别对50例经活检证实为单侧(n = 25)或双侧(n = 25)放射复发性PCa的男性进行了SFC或STC。治疗后通过前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试,经直肠超声检查,活检和问卷对患者进行评估。使用Phoenix标准(PSA最低点+ 2 mg / mL)定义生化衰竭(BF)。对数据进行前瞻性收集和回顾性分析。结果冷冻消融前PSA水平和格里森评分分别为:SFC为2.8 ng / mL和7,STC为3.9 ng / mL和7。 SFC和STC的中位随访时间分别为31和53个月(P = 0.004)。肿瘤学结果如下:无患者死亡;一名接受STC治疗的患者发生了骨转移; 8例接受SFC的患者和3例接受STC的患者有BF,5年无BF生存率分别为54%和86%。在没有BF的患者中,SFC的平均PSA在第一年内下降了86%,STC的平均PSA下降了90%,并且保持稳定。功能结果如下:STC组中三名(13%)患者发生新的尿失禁,而SFC组中没有患者出现失禁(P = 0.10); SFC组的7名患者中有2名保留了术后效力,但STC组的4名有力患者中没有一名术后恢复了效力(P = 0.48)。 STC组中的一名患者(4%)出现了直肠尿道瘘,但SFC组中未发生(P = 0.48)。结论SFC和STC可行且安全,中期肿瘤学结局可接受。对于精心挑选的患者,与STC相比,SFC是一种可以降低与治疗相关的发病率的方法。尽管需要更长的随访时间和更多的患者人数,但我们对SFC和STC的初步肿瘤学和功能结局令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号