首页> 外文期刊>Neural computing & applications >A comparison of time series and machine learning models for inflation forecasting: empirical evidence from the USA
【24h】

A comparison of time series and machine learning models for inflation forecasting: empirical evidence from the USA

机译:通货膨胀预测的时间序列和机器学习模型的比较:来自美国的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares time series and machine learning models for inflation forecasting. Empirical evidence from the USA between 1984 and 2014 suggests that out of sixteen conditions (four different inflation indicators and four different horizons), machine learning models provide more accurate forecasting results in seven conditions and the time series models are better in nine conditions. Moreover, multivariate models give better results in fourteen conditions, and univariate models are better only in two conditions. This study shows that machine learning model prevails against time series models for the core personal consumption expenditure (core-PCE) inflation forecasting, and the time series model (ARDL) is better for the core consumer price (core-CPI) index inflation forecasting in all horizons.
机译:本研究比较了通胀预测的时间序列和机器学习模型。 来自美国1984年至2014年期间的经验证据表明,在十六条条件下(四种不同的通胀指标和四种不同的视野),机器学习模型在七条条件下提供更准确的预测结果,而时间序列模型在九个条件下更好。 此外,多变量模型在十四条条件下提供更好的结果,并且单变量模型仅在两个条件下更好。 本研究表明,机器学习模型对核心个人消费支出(核心PCE)通货膨胀预测(核心PCE)通胀预测的时间序列模型普遍存在于时间序列模型(ARDL)对核心消费者价格(CORE-CPI)指数通胀预测更好 各种各样的视野。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号