首页> 外文期刊>Laboratory news >Making a value judgement
【24h】

Making a value judgement

机译:重视判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All good scientists will be aware that sometimes,perhaps even often,their research will have implications for people and wider society beyond the laboratory.Considering those implications-the potential benefits and harms-and how they fit with the values people hold important,is how bioethicists spend their days.Bioethics has become a global occupation,with large amounts of academic research being undertaken across the world and government-appointed bioethics committees now in existence in many countries.The UK is no different,and we have a thriving bioethics community.Something that sets us apart,however,is the absence of a state-run bioethics committee.There is some history behind this.In the late 1980s,the quest to map the entire human genome was gaining momentum,and the lack of a UK national bioethics committee to consider the ethical issues this raised was emerging as a problem.Parliamentary debates on abortion and embryo research took place without,according to the British Medical Journal,”a clear and authoritative source of professional advice or a collective lead on the wider ethical and policy issues”.Yet the government of the day were not minded to set up a national bioethics committee.
机译:所有好的科学家都会意识到有时候,甚至通常,他们的研究也会对人类和更广泛的社会产生影响,超越实验室。这些影响 - 潜在的福利和危害 - 以及如何与价值观的危害是如何实现的生物挑战主义者度过了他们的日子。自我伦理已经成为一个全球职业,在世界各国和政府指定的生物伦理委员会上进行了大量的学术研究。英国没有什么不同,我们有一个蓬勃发展的生物伦理区。然而,让我们分开的东西是缺乏国营的生物伦理委员会。在20世纪80年代后期,在20世纪80年代后期,寻求映射整个人类基因组的势头,缺乏英国国家缺乏根据英国医疗的说法,生物伦理委员会认为这提出的道德问题是出现的。期刊,“关于更广泛的道德和政策问题的专业咨询或专业咨询或集体领导的一个明确授权的来源”。yet当天的政府并不介意建立一个国家生物伦理委员会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号