首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Increased risk of ACL revision with non-surgical treatment of a concomitant medial collateral ligament injury: a study on 19,457 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry
【24h】

Increased risk of ACL revision with non-surgical treatment of a concomitant medial collateral ligament injury: a study on 19,457 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry

机译:伴随伴随内侧副韧带损伤的非手术治疗增加了ACL修正的风险:19,457名瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeTo determine how concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries affect outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsPatients aged>15years who were registered in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry for primary ACL reconstruction between 2005 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with a concomitant MCL or LCL injury were stratified according to collateral ligament treatment (non-surgical, repair or reconstruction), and one isolated ACL reconstruction group was created. The outcomes were ACL revision and the 2-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), which were analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression and an analysis of covariance, respectively.ResultsA total of 19,457 patients (mean age 27.9 years, 59.4% males) met the inclusion criteria. An isolated ACL reconstruction implied a lower risk of ACL revision compared with presence of a non-surgically treated MCL injury (HR=0.61 [95% CI 0.41-0.89], p=0.0097) but not compared with MCL repair or reconstruction. A concomitant LCL injury did not impact the risk of ACL revision. Patients with a concomitant MCL or LCL injury reported inferior 2-year KOOS compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. The largest difference was found in the sports and recreation subscale across all groups, with MCL reconstruction resulting in the maximum difference (14.1 points [95% CI 4.3-23.9], p=0.005).ConclusionNon-surgical treatment of a concomitant MCL injury in the setting of an ACL reconstruction may increase the risk of ACL revision. However, surgical treatment of the MCL injury was associated with a worse two-year patient-reported knee function. A concomitant LCL injury does not impact the risk of ACL revision compared with an isolated ACL reconstruction.Level of evidenceCohort study, Level III.
机译:PUPOSETO确定伴随的内侧副韧带(MCL)和侧侧侧韧带(LCL)损伤在前十字韧带(ACL)重建后发生影响。在2005年瑞典国家膝盖韧带注册中登记的患者15年代的一致性,以获得2005年的主要ACL重建。 2016年有资格包涵式。根据副韧带治疗(非手术,修复或重建)分层伴随着MCL或LCl损伤的患者,并创建了一种分离的ACL重建组。结果是ACL修正,2年膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果分数(KOOS)分别分析,分别分析了协方差分析。培训共计19,457名患者(平均27.9岁,59.4%雄性)达到了包含标准。分离的ACL重建暗示与存在的非手术处理的MCL损伤(HR = 0.61 [95%CI 0.89],P = 0.0097)相比较低的ACL修正的风险较低,但与MCL修复或重建相比。伴随的LCL损伤没有影响ACL修订的风险。伴随着MCL或LCL损伤的患者报告了与分离的ACL重建相比较差的2年KOOS。所有群体中的运动和娱乐次数中发现了最大的差异,MCL重建导致最大差异(14.1分[95%CI 4.3-23.9],p = 0.005)。CLUSUSNON-手术治疗伴随的MCL损伤ACL重建的设置可能会增加ACL修订的风险。然而,MCL损伤的手术治疗与较差的两年患者报告的膝关节术有关。与分离的ACL重建相比,伴随的LCL损伤不会影响ACL修正的风险。EVIDENCOHORT研究的研究,III水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号