...
首页> 外文期刊>Methods of information in medicine >Quality of the ICD-11 Beta Draft from the German Perspective: Evaluation Based on the Alphabet of ICD-10-GM 2017
【24h】

Quality of the ICD-11 Beta Draft from the German Perspective: Evaluation Based on the Alphabet of ICD-10-GM 2017

机译:来自德国视角的ICD-11 Beta草案的质量:根据ICD-10-GM 2017的字母评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology implemented a field test for the ICD-11 Beta Draft. Aim was to analyze completeness and appropriateness of the ICD-11 Beta Draft in its entire breadth. Methods: Starting point was the synonym thesaurus ("Alphabet") of the German modification of ICD-10. The Alphabet included a list of diagnoses terms that supports the coding of diagnoses with ICD-10. A sample of 60,328 diagnosis terms was drawn to be mapped to the ICD-11 Beta Draft. A subsample of 13,975 diagnosis terms was prepared for assessing reliability. First, the coders had to assign a diagnosis term from the sample to an appropriate English one. This included the automatic selection of the respective code from the ICD-11 Beta Draft. Secondly, the coders had to answer questions regarding completeness, appropriateness, and other issues. Results: Finally, 49,184 results from 36 coders were available for the analysis. Problems with completeness were indicated in 4.7% of the results, problems with appropriateness in 5.3%. On the level of chapters, Cohen's kappa reached grade "fair" at a maximum. The coders agreed in 31.4% of the terms. Conclusions: Problems with the ICD-11 Beta Draft appeared to be moderate. Completeness was high, reliability was low as it is known for ICD-10. Concerns with the structure of the ICD-11 Beta Draft were noted, e.g. for neoplasms. A post processing of the ICD-11 Beta Draft seems to be sufficient with regard to the content. Methodologically, a thorough review of the structure might be advisable.
机译:目标:德国医学信息学,生物谱和流行病学协会为ICD-11 Beta草案实施了一个现场测试。目的是分析其整个广度上的ICD-11 Beta草案的完整性和适当性。方法:起点是ICD-10德国修改的代名词(“字母”)。字母表包括支持使用ICD-10的诊断编码的诊断列表。绘制了60,328个诊断术语的样本,以映射到ICD-11 Beta草案。准备评估可靠性13,975个诊断术语的子样本。首先,编码器必须将诊断项从样本分配给适当的英语。这包括从ICD-11 Beta草案自动选择各个代码。其次,编码人员必须回答有关完整性,适当性和其他问题的问题。结果:最后,有49,184个编码器的结果可用于分析。完整性的问题在4.7%的结果中表明,适当的问题5.3%。在章节水平上,科恩的喀普萨最多达到“公平”。编码人员在31.4%的条款中同意。结论:ICD-11 Beta草案的问题似乎是中等的。完整性很高,可靠性低,因为ICD-10已知。指出了与ICD-11 Braft结构的关注,例如,对于肿瘤。 ICD-11 Beta草案的后处理似乎足够了解内容。方法论上讲,可能是建议对结构的彻底审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号