...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The safety and efficacy of alfentanil-based induction in bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
【24h】

The safety and efficacy of alfentanil-based induction in bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

机译:基于苜蓿的诱导在支气管镜镇静中的安全性和有效性:随机,双盲,受控试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background:Alfentanil in combination with propofol produces a synergistic sedative effect in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FB). However, the use of this combination is controversial due to the risk of cardiopulmonary depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proper induction regimen of alfentanil in propofol target-controlled infusion for FB sedation.Methods:One hundred seventy-three patients were assigned randomly into 5 regimens: Group 1 and 2, alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg, respectively, immediately before propofol administration; Group 3 and 4, alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg, respectively, 2minutes before propofol administration; and Group 5, propofol administration alone to achieve the observer assessment of alertness and sedation scale 3 approximate to 2. The bronchoscopists, physicians in charge of sedation, and patients were blind to the regimens. Adverse events, drug dose, induction, procedure and recovery time, cough severity, and propofol injection related pain were recorded.Results:The patients in groups 2 and 4 required a lower dose of propofol (P = 0.031 and 0.019, respectively) and shorter time (P = 0.035 and 0.010) than group 5 for induction. Patients in group 2 experienced more hypoxemia than those in group 5 during induction (P = 0.031). The physician in charge of sedation scored a lower severity of cough in the patients in group 4 than in groups 3 and 5. There were no differences in terms of propofol injection related pain among the groups.Conclusion:Alfentanil 5g/kg given immediately before propofol infusion cannot be recommended. Further study is required to define conclusions about alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg because of the low power rating of subgroup in the present study.
机译:背景:苜蓿与异丙酚组合产生了持续支气管镜检查(FB)的患者中的协同镇静作用。然而,由于心肺抑郁症的风险,这种组合的使用是有争议的。本研究的目的是评估alfentanil在异丙酚靶控制输注中的适当诱导方案,用于FB镇静。方法:一百七十三名患者随机分配成5个方案:第1组和2,Alfentanil 2.5和5g / kg分别在异丙酚给药之前立即;第3组和4,苜蓿2.5和5g / kg分别在异丙酚给药前2分钟;第5组,单独的异丙酚给药,实现观察者的警觉和镇静标度3近似为2.支气管镜检查员,负责镇静的医生,患者对方案视而不见。记录不良事件,药物剂量,诱导,程序和恢复时间,咳嗽严重程度和异丙酚注射相关的疼痛。结果:第2组和4组的患者需要较低剂量的异丙酚(P = 0.031和0.019)和更短时间(p = 0.035和0.010)比第5组用于诱导。第2组患者经历了比诱导过程中第5组更低氧血症的更低氧血症(P = 0.031)。镇静的医生比3组患者咳嗽较小,比3和5.群体中的异丙酚注射液相关疼痛的差异。结论:alfentanil 5g / kg在异丙酚之前立即给予无法推荐注发。进一步的研究是由于本研究中亚组的低功率等级来定义关于Alfentanil 2.5和5G / kg的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号