...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The safety and efficacy of alfentanil-based induction in bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
【24h】

The safety and efficacy of alfentanil-based induction in bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

机译:基于阿芬太尼的诱导剂在支气管镜镇静中的安全性和有效性:一项随机,双盲,对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background:Alfentanil in combination with propofol produces a synergistic sedative effect in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FB). However, the use of this combination is controversial due to the risk of cardiopulmonary depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proper induction regimen of alfentanil in propofol target-controlled infusion for FB sedation.Methods:One hundred seventy-three patients were assigned randomly into 5 regimens: Group 1 and 2, alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg, respectively, immediately before propofol administration; Group 3 and 4, alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg, respectively, 2minutes before propofol administration; and Group 5, propofol administration alone to achieve the observer assessment of alertness and sedation scale 3 approximate to 2. The bronchoscopists, physicians in charge of sedation, and patients were blind to the regimens. Adverse events, drug dose, induction, procedure and recovery time, cough severity, and propofol injection related pain were recorded.Results:The patients in groups 2 and 4 required a lower dose of propofol (P = 0.031 and 0.019, respectively) and shorter time (P = 0.035 and 0.010) than group 5 for induction. Patients in group 2 experienced more hypoxemia than those in group 5 during induction (P = 0.031). The physician in charge of sedation scored a lower severity of cough in the patients in group 4 than in groups 3 and 5. There were no differences in terms of propofol injection related pain among the groups.Conclusion:Alfentanil 5g/kg given immediately before propofol infusion cannot be recommended. Further study is required to define conclusions about alfentanil 2.5 and 5g/kg because of the low power rating of subgroup in the present study.
机译:背景:阿芬太尼联合丙泊酚在接受柔性支气管镜检查(FB)的患者中产生协同镇静作用。然而,由于存在心肺抑制的风险,这种组合的使用引起争议。这项研究的目的是评估丙泊酚靶控输注中阿芬太尼诱导FB镇静的正确方案。方法:将173例患者随机分为5种方案:第1组和第2组,阿芬太尼2.5和5g / kg分别在异丙酚给药前第3组和第4组,丙泊酚给药前2分钟的阿芬太尼分别为2.5和5g / kg;第5组,仅丙泊酚给药即可达到观察者对警觉性和镇静等级3的评估,接近2。支气管镜医师,负责镇静的医生和患者对治疗方案视而不见。记录不良事件,药物剂量,诱导,操作和恢复时间,咳嗽的严重程度以及与丙泊酚注射有关的疼痛。结果:第2组和第4组患者需要较低剂量的丙泊酚(分别为P = 0.031和0.019)并且更短时间(P = 0.035和0.010)比第5组诱导。在诱导期间,第2组患者的低氧血症比第5组更多(P = 0.031)。镇静医生对第4组患者的咳嗽的严重程度低于第3和第5组。两组之间在异丙酚注射相关疼痛方面无差异。结论:在异丙酚给药前立即给予阿芬太尼5g / kg不建议输液。由于本研究中亚组的额定功率较低,因此需要进一步研究以得出有关阿芬太尼2.5和5g / kg的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号