...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Dosimetric evaluation of incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy for patients with left-sided early breast cancer in the IMRT era
【24h】

Dosimetric evaluation of incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy for patients with left-sided early breast cancer in the IMRT era

机译:IMRT时代左侧早期乳腺癌患者整个乳房放射治疗症杂交的偶然辐射的剂量测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric parameters for incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Twenty left breast cancer patients treated with WBRT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled in this study. Remnant breast tissue, 3 levels of the axilla, heart, and lung were delineated. We used 2 different radiotherapy methods: 3D-CRT with field-in-field technique and 7-field fixed-beam IMRT. The target coverage of IMRT was significantly better than that of 3D-CRT (D-mean: 49.72 +/- 0.64 Gy vs 50.24 +/- 0.66 Gy, P<0.001; V-45: 93.19 +/- 1.40% vs 98.59 +/- 0.30%, P<0.001; V-47.5: 86.43 +/- 2.72% vs 95.00 +/- 0.02%, P<0.001, for 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively). In the IMRT plan, a lower dose was delivered to a wider region of the heart and lung. Significantly lower axillary irradiation was shown throughout each level of axilla by IMRT compared to 3D-CRT (D-mean for level I: 42.58 +/- 5.31 Gy vs 14.49 +/- 6.91 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for level II: 26.25 +/- 10.43 Gy vs 3.41 +/- 3.11 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for level III: 6.26 +/- 4.69 Gy vs 1.16 +/- 0.51 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for total axilla: 33.9 +/- 6.89 Gy vs 9.96 +/- 5.21 Gy, P<0.001, for 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively). In conclusion, the incidental dose delivered to the axilla was significantly lower for IMRT compared to 3D-CRT. Therefore, IMRT, which only includes the breast parenchyma, should be cautiously used in patients with limited positive sentinel lymph nodes and who do not undergo complete axillary lymph node dissection.
机译:本研究的目的是将整个乳房放射治疗(WBRT)的偶然辐射的剂量测量比较,具有三维保形放疗(3D-CRT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)。在本研究中注册了在母乳液保护外科(BCS)后用WBRT治疗的二十左乳腺癌患者。残余乳腺组织,3级腋窝,心脏和肺部划定。我们使用了2种不同的放射疗法方法:3D-CRT与现场技术和7场固定光束IMRT。 IMRT的目标覆盖率明显优于3D-CRT(D-均值:49.72 +/- 0.64 Gy Vs 50.24 +/- 0.66 Gy,P <0.001; V-45:93.19 +/- 1.40%VS 98.59 + / - 0.30%,P <0.001; V-47.5:86.43 +/- 2.72%与3D-CRT和IMRT分别为3D-CRT和IMRT的P <0.001)。在IMRT计划中,将较低的剂量递送至心脏和肺的更广泛的区域。通过IMRT与3D-CRT相比,在每种水平的腋窝中显示腋窝辐射显着降低(D-平均I级:42.58 +/- 5.31 Gy,P <0.001; D-Imply ii :26.25 +/- 10.43 GY VS 3.41 +/- 3.11 GY,P <0.001; D-均值III:6.26 +/- 4.69 GY VS 1.16 +/- 0.51 GY,P <0.001; D-胰岛素:33.9 +/- 6.89 GY VS 9.96 +/- 5.21 GY,P <0.001,3D-CRT和IMRT)分别为3D-CRT和IMRT)。总之,与3D-CRT相比,IMRT递送给腋窝的偶然剂量显着降低。因此,仅包括乳房实质的IMRT应该致致致癌患者患有有限的阳离子淋巴结淋巴结患者,并且不会经历完全腋窝淋巴结解剖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号