首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >A feasibility study of independent verification of dose calculation for Vero4DRT using a Clarkson-based algorithm
【24h】

A feasibility study of independent verification of dose calculation for Vero4DRT using a Clarkson-based algorithm

机译:基于Clarkson算法的Vero4drt对vero4drt的独立验证的可行性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dose verification for a gimbal-mounted image-guided radiotherapy system, Vero4DRT (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) is usually carried out by pretreatment measurement. Independent verification calculations using Monte Carlo methods for Vero4DRT have been published. As the Clarkson method is faster and easier to use than measurement and Monte Carlo methods, we evaluated the accuracy of an independent calculation verification program and its feasibility as a secondary check for Vero4DRT. Computed tomography (CT)-based dose calculation was performed using a modified Clarkson-based algorithm. In this study, 120 patients' treatment plans were collected in our institute. The treatments were performed using conventional irradiation for lung and prostate, 3-dimensional (3D) conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the lung, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the prostate. Differences between the treatment planning system (TPS) and the Clarkson-based independent dose verification software were computed, and confidence limits (CLs, mean +/- 2 standard deviation %) for Vero4DRT were compared with the CLs for the C-arms linear accelerators in the previous study. The results of the CLs, the conventional irradiation, SBRT, and IMRT showed 2.2 +/- 3.5% (CL of the C-arms linear accelerators: 2.4 +/- 5.3%), 1.1 +/- 1.7% (-0.3 +/- 2.0%), 4.8 +/- 3.7% (5.4 +/- 5.3%), and -0.5 + 2.5% (-0.1 +/- 3.6%) differences, respectively. The dose disagreement between the TPS and CT-based independent dose verification software was less than the 5% action level of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 114 (TG114). The CLs for the gimbal-mounted Vero4DRT were similar to the deviations for C-arms linear accelerators. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:对于Gimbal安装的图像引导放射疗法系统,Vero4drt(三菱重工有限公司,东京,日本)的剂量验证通常是通过预处理测量进行的。使用Monte Carlo方法进行Vero4drt的独立验证计算已发布。由于克拉克森方法比测量和蒙特卡罗方法更快,更容易使用,我们评估了独立计算验证程序的准确性及其可行性作为Vero4drt的二级检查。使用基于修改的Clarkson的算法执行计算的断层扫描(CT)的基于剂量计算。在本研究中,在我们的研究所收集了120名患者的治疗计划。使用常规辐照对肺和肺的三维(3D)共形立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)进行治疗,用于前列腺的强度调制的放射治疗(IMRT)。计算治疗系统(TPS)和基于Clarkson的独立剂量验证软件之间的差异,与C形臂线性加速器的CLS相比,将Vero4DRT的置信限制(CLS,平均值+/- 2标准偏差%)进行比较在以前的研究中。 CLS,常规辐照,SBRT和IMRT的结果显示2.2 +/- 3.5%(C臂线性促进剂的CL:2.4 +/- 5.3%),1.1 +/- 1.7%(-0.3 + / - 2.0%),4.8 +/- 3.7%(5.4 +/- 5.3%),分别为-0.5 + 2.5%(-0.1 +/- 3.6%)差异。 TPS和CT的独立剂量验证软件之间的剂量分歧小于美国物理学家(AAPM)任务组114(TG114)的美国物理学协会的5%行动水平。 Gimbal安装的Vero4DR的CLS类似于C臂线性加速器的偏差。 (c)2017年美国医疗剂量分子协会。由elsevier Inc.保留所有权利发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号