>This paper examines whether coaching and general manager (GM) changes among three professional sports leagues—the National Football League (NFL), the Maj'/> The effect of management changes on winning in professional sports: Analysis using a dynamic lag adjustment model
首页> 外文期刊>Managerial and decision economics: The international journal of research and progress in management economics >The effect of management changes on winning in professional sports: Analysis using a dynamic lag adjustment model
【24h】

The effect of management changes on winning in professional sports: Analysis using a dynamic lag adjustment model

机译:管理变化对专业运动中获胜的影响:使用动态滞后调整模型分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>This paper examines whether coaching and general manager (GM) changes among three professional sports leagues—the National Football League (NFL), the Major League Baseball (MLB), and the National Basketball Association (NBA)—effect on‐field performance. Our empirical methodology uses team‐level data by season and adapts a lag adjustment econometric approach designed to resolve several statistical challenges that arise both in general managerial settings and in sports settings. Our main finding is that coaching changes in the NFL boost the number of wins per season by between 0.5 and 1.2 in each of the first five seasons. Coaching changes have smaller, but still positive, impacts in the MLB and NBA. For all the three leagues, we find that GM changes have no discernable impact on performance. A separate cross‐sectional analysis suggests that those small impacts stem from coaches and GMs having extremely compressed talent distributions. The data indicate that coaches and GMs, en masse, are important, but changing the people who occupy those positions rarely seems to move teams to different locations on the performance distribution.
机译: >本文审查了三位专业体育联盟 - 国家足球联盟(NFL),主要联盟棒球(MLB)和国家篮球协会(NBA) - 野外竞技队(NBA)的变化吗?表现。我们的经验方法逐季使用团队级数据,并适应延迟调整计量经济学方法,旨在解决一般管理设置和体育设置中出现的几种统计挑战。我们的主要发现是,在前五个赛季中每个赛季的NFL中的竞争变化会增加每季的胜利数。教练变化较小,但仍然是积极的,在MLB和NBA中的影响。对于所有三个联赛,我们发现转基金的变化对性能没有可辨别的影响。单独的横截面分析表明,那些小冲击源于具有极其压缩人才分布的教练和GMS。这些数据表明教练和GMS,en Masse是重要的,但更改占据这些职位的人似乎似乎将团队转移到不同的位置,以便在绩效分布上移动不同的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号