首页> 外文期刊>Medical Journal Armed Forces India >β-D-Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan assays in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections
【24h】

β-D-Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan assays in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections

机译:β-D-葡聚糖和曲霉属半乳甘露霉病毒在侵袭性真菌感染的诊断中测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: With an increase in the number of patients who are immunosuppressed or immunocompromised there has been an increase in invasive fungal infection (IFI) in the past few decades with its assohciated high morbidity and mortality, ranging from 60% to 90%. The critical problem is the identification of the causative fungus and initiation of appropriate therapy. Hence, there is a requirement for better diagnostic methods for IFI. Detection of markers for the presence of fungi during early stage of the infection, such as constituents of the cell wall or fungal DNA, is essential for timely diagnosis of IFI. Galactomannan (GM) which is a cell wall surface antigen is the most studied diagnostic marker, followed by 1,3 β-D-Glucan (BG) which is seen in deep layers of cell wall. Methods: We have assessed the effectiveness of Galactomannan/β-D-Glucan for the early diagnosis of IFI in immunosuppressed patients in our tertiary care setting. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of GM assay were 45%, 93%, 86% and 63% respectively, while the BG assay showed a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 85%, Positive predictive value (PPV) 84% and Negative predictive value (NPV) 79%. Conclusion: BG assay is better for detection of IFI in patients with immunosuppression. However, a combination of both BG and GM assays would be the best approach as BG assay is highly sensitive, while the GM assay is highly specific for diagnosing IFI.
机译:背景:随着免疫抑制或免疫抑制的患者数量增加,过去几十年的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)增加了其分化的高发病率和死亡率,从60%到90%。关键问题是鉴定致病真菌和适当治疗的开始。因此,需要更好地为IFI诊断方法。检测在感染早期存在真菌的标记,例如细胞壁或真菌DNA的成分,对于及时诊断IFI是必不可少的。作为细胞壁表面抗原的半乳甘露甘露甘露甘油(GM)是最多研究的诊断标志物,其次是在细胞壁深层中看到的1,3β-D-葡聚糖(BG)。方法:我们评估了加乳甘露昔南/β-D-葡聚糖的有效性,用于在我们的第三级护理环境中免疫抑制患者IFI早期诊断。结果:GM测定的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和负预测值分别为45%,93%,86%和63%,而BG测定显示敏感性为78%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值(PPV)84%和负预测值(NPV)79%。结论:BG测定更好地检测免疫抑制患者IFI。然而,BG和GM测定的组合是最好的方法,因为BG测定是高度敏感的,而GM测定是诊断IFI的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号