...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical research letters: MRL >Instruments for determining clinically relevant fatigue in breast cancer patients during radiotherapy
【24h】

Instruments for determining clinically relevant fatigue in breast cancer patients during radiotherapy

机译:放射治疗期间乳腺癌患者临床相关疲劳的仪器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background This study aimed to determine radiotherapy (RT)-related changes in cancer-related fatigue (CRF), using Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20), and fatigue-intensity rating (FIR) instruments at three different timepoints and to identify the optimal thresholds of MFI-20 scores which would correlate with moderate-to-severe fatigue warranting an intervention in breast cancer patients treated with RT. Methods Eighty-eight breast cancer patients treated with surgery followed by RT were included in the study. CRF was assessed with both FIR and MFI-20 tools at three different timepoints: within the week prior to RT (pre-RT), last week of RT, and 6 weeks after RT completion (post-RT). Changes in measurements, correlations between measurements and optimal cutpoints of MFI-20 scores were analyzed. Results While FIR scores significantly changed over time (eta(2): 0.179), changes in MFI-20 scores were relatively small (eta(2): 0.076). Comparisons of the last week of RT versus post-RT scores showed small-to-moderate decrease for MFI-20 and FIR. FIR and MFI-20 scores were correlated at all timepoints and most correlated during and after RT (r = 0.525 95%CI 0.346-0.667, r = 0.791 95%CI 0.692-0.860 and r = 0.716 95%CI 0.589-0.808, respectively). Furthermore, the most correlated MFI-20 subscale with FIR was general fatigue (r = 0.603 95%CI 0.442-0.725, r = 0.821 95%CI 0.734-0.881 and r = 0.754 95%CI 0.641-0.835, respectively). Optimal cutpoints of the MFI-20 total scores corresponding to FIR scores >= 4 was 43.5 for all timepoints and the MFI total scores corresponding to FIR score >= 7 were 53.5, 52.5 and 60.5, respectively. Conclusions MFI-20 and FIR scores are highly correlated measures of CRF among breast cancer patients treated with RT. An MFI-20 score of >= 43.5 is suggested as a clinically significant score indicating moderate-to-severe fatigue, while an MFI score of >= 52.5 is indicative of severe fatigue.
机译:背景技术本研究旨在使用三种不同的时间点的多维疲劳库存-20(MFI-20)和疲劳 - 强度评级(FIR)仪器来确定癌症相关疲劳(CRF)的放疗(RT)相关变化,以及在三种不同的时间点和识别MFI-20分数的最佳阈值,其与中度至严重的疲劳相关,需要治疗RT的乳腺癌患者的干预。方法采用手术治疗的八十八条乳腺癌患者,然后纳入RT。 CRF在杉木和MFI-20工具中评估了三种不同的时间点:在RT(RT)之前的一周内,RT完成后的RT和RT完成后6周(RT)。测量的变化,分析了MFI-20分数之间测量和最佳切口之间的相关性。结果随着时间的推移显着变化,而FIR评分(ETA(2):0.179),MFI-20分数的变化相对较小(ETA(2):0.076)。 RT与RT分数的最后一周的比较显示MFI-20和FIR的小于适度降低。 FIR和MFI-20分数在所有时间点和最均在RT期间和最相关的分数(R = 0.525 95%CI 0.346-0.667,R = 0.791 95%CI 0.692-0.860和R = 0.716 95%CI 0.589-0.808 )。此外,具有FIR的最相关的MFI-20子级是通用疲劳(r = 0.603 95%CI 0.442-0.725,r = 0.821 95%CI 0.734-0.81和r = 0.754 95%CI 0.641-0.835。所有时间点的MFI-20对应于FIR分数的总分数的最佳切口点为43.5,所有时间点和对应于FIR分数> = 7的MFI总分别分别为53.5,52.5和60.5。结论MFI-20和FIR分数是RT治疗乳腺癌患者CRF的高度相关性测量。 MFI-20分数> = 43.5被认为是指出中度至严重疲劳的临床显着分数,而MFI评分> = 52.5的MFI评分表示严重疲劳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号