...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:对腹膜癌症的加压腹膜气溶胶化疗的可行性和安全性:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as a novel repeatable treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The available evidence from the pioneer center suggests good tolerance and high response rates, but independent confirmation is needed. A single-center cohort was analyzed one year after implementation for feasibility and safety. Methods. PIPAC was started in January 2015, and every patient was entered into a prospective database. This retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients operated until April 2016 with emphasis on surgical feasibility and early postoperative outcomes. Results. Forty-two patients (M?:?F?=?8?:?34, median age 66 (59–73) years) with 91 PIPAC procedures in total (4×: 1, ?3×: 17, ?2×: 12, and ?1×: 12) were analyzed. Abdominal accessibility rate was 95% (42/44); laparoscopic access was not feasible in 2 patients with previous HIPEC. Median initial peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 10 (IQR 5–17). Median operation time was 94?min (89–108) with no learning curve observed. One PIPAC application was postponed due to intraoperative intestinal lesion. Overall morbidity was 9% with 7 minor complications (Clavien I-II) and one PIPAC-unrelated postoperative mortality. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-3). Conclusion. Repetitive PIPAC is feasible in most patients with refractory carcinomatosis of various origins. Intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity rates were low. This encourages prospective studies assessing oncological efficacy.
机译:背景。已引入加压腹膜气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)作为腹膜癌症的新型可重复治疗。来自先锋中心的可用证据表明良好的宽容和高响应率,但需要独立的确认。在实施可行性和安全后一年分析单中心队列。方法。 Pipac于2015年1月开始,每位患者都进入了潜在数据库。此回顾性分析包括所有连续的患者,直至2016年4月,重点是外科可行性和早期术后结果。结果。四十二名患者(M?:?F?=?8?:34,中位数66(59-73)年)总共有91个PIPAC程序(4×:1,?3×:17,?2× :分析了12,且1×:12)进行了分析。腹部可达率为95%(42/44);腹腔镜接入在2名以前的高度高度患者中不可行。中位初始腹膜癌症指数(PCI)是10(IQR 5-17)。中位运行时间为94?min(89-108),没有观察到的学习曲线。由于术中肠道病变而推迟了一个PIPAC应用。总体发病率为9%,7次轻微并发症(Clavien I-II)和一个PIPAC-无关的术后死亡率。中位术后住院住宿时间为3天(2-3)。结论。在大多数难治性致癌症的患者中,重复钳是可行的各种起源的患者。术中并发症和术后发病率低。这鼓励预期研究评估肿瘤效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号