首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >The world(s) we live in - Inter-agency collaboration in forest management
【24h】

The world(s) we live in - Inter-agency collaboration in forest management

机译:我们在森林管理中居住在机构间合作中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Academics and politicians alike have argued for greater inter-agency collaboration to address sector-crossing policy issues, such as health care, policing, or natural resource management. Nevertheless, in reality, it remains a rare occurrence. We examine local-level (street-level) collaboration in the context of public forest management in Germany where, historically, public forests were solely under the forest management agency's authority. With the establishment of a nature conservation agency and subsequent legislative changes, responsibilities and authorities were increasingly distributed among both agencies. Today, the two agencies are connected through a system of approval procedures and expected to collaborate to further nature conservation objectives. We aim to understand how the mandate to collaborate is put into practice, and find a diversity of local level agency relationships. While the literature suggests the benefits of inter-agency collaboration stems from including a diversity of disciplines and compensating for limited resources, we find these aspects to pose significant challenges in local level practices. Aside from actor-related factors, we also found systemic and societal actors to be a strong influence on inter-agency exchange.
机译:学者和政治家都认为更大的机构间合作,以解决卫生保健,警务或自然资源管理等部门过境政策问题。然而,实际上,它仍然是一种罕见的发生。我们在德国公共森林管理背景下审查地方级(街道级)合作,历史上,公共森林仅在森林管理机构的权威下。随着自然保护机构的建立和随后的立法变革,责任和当局越来越多地分布在两个机构中。今天,这两家机构通过批准程序和预计协作进一步自然保护目标的协调。我们的目标是要了解合作的任务是如何实践,并找到一个多样性的地方级代理关系。虽然文献表明,机构间协作的益处源于包括多样性的学科和补偿资源有限的资源,但我们发现这些方面在地方一级实践中提出了重大挑战。除了与演员相关的因素外,我们还发现系统性和社会行动者对机构间交流产生了强烈影响力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号