...
首页> 外文期刊>Flow Measurement and Instrumentation >Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters
【24h】

Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters

机译:单孔和多孔孔口气体流量计的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As energy efficiency is becoming more important today due to limited energy resources as well as their rising prices and environment issues, it is crucial to have reliable measurement data of different fluids in production processes. Because of its simplicity, affordability and reliability, orifice flow meters are again becoming subject of numerous researches. Conventional single-hole orifice (SHO) flow meter has many advantages but also some disadvantages like higher pressure drop, slower pressure recovery, lower discharge coefficient etc. Some of these disadvantages can be overcame by multi-hole orifice (MHO) flow meter while still maintaining advantages of conventional SHO meter. Both SHO and MHO flow meters with same β ratios were experimentally tested and compared. Results showed better (lower) singular pressure loss coefficient and lower pressure drop in favour of the MHO flow meter. Experimental data indicates that MHO flow meter is superior to the conventional orifice flow meter, but further research is necessary to make the MHO a drop-in replacement for a SHO flow meter.
机译:由于能源效率越来越重要,由于能源有限,价格上涨和环境问题,在生产过程中具有不同流体的可靠测量数据至关重要。由于其简单性,可负担性和可靠性,孔口流量计再次成为众多研究的主题。传统的单孔孔口(SHO)流量计具有许多优点,也具有较高的压降,较慢的压力回收,较低的放电系数等的一些缺点。这些缺点中的一些可以通过多孔孔口(MHO)流量计来克服保持常规Sho表的优点。实验测试和比较具有相同β比率的SHO和MHO流量计。结果显示出更好(较低)奇异的压力损失系数和低压下降,有利于MHO流量计。实验数据表明,MHO流量计优于传统的孔口流量计,但是进一步的研究是使MHO成为鞋流量计的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号