...
首页> 外文期刊>Early intervention in psychiatry >Negotiating the boundaries of psychosis: A qualitative study of the service provider perspective on treatment delay in community mental health
【24h】

Negotiating the boundaries of psychosis: A qualitative study of the service provider perspective on treatment delay in community mental health

机译:谈判精神病的界限:服务提供商对社区心理健康治疗延迟的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim Evidence shows that many patients are detected and treated late in their course of illness, and that substantial delay occurs even after entry to mental health services. Although several studies have examined the service user and carer perspectives on treatment delay, few have explored the issue from the service provider perspective. The aim of this study was to broaden our understanding of treatment delay by exploring the service provider perspective on reasons for treatment delay in community mental health services. Methods A qualitative study using data from focus group interviews with 33 healthcare professionals in community mental health care. Interview data were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a grounded theory approach. Results Service providers perceived divergent or conflicting perspectives as the main challenge in early psychosis. Clinical negotiation was chosen as the main term describing the interactions between patients and healthcare professionals: This was observed in 3 overlapping areas: (1) Negotiating the patients status as help‐seeker; (2) Negotiating the place and conditions of treatment and (3) Negotiating the meaning of distressing experiences and the timing of treatment options. Conclusions This study suggests that delay in initiation of treatment for psychosis in community mental health is related to clinical challenges of early disengagement from services and diagnostic uncertainty. Service providers found negotiating the therapeutic relationship and patient‐centred flexibility more useful in ensuring engagement than an assertive outreach approach. Diagnostic uncertainty was resolved through watchful waiting using a distress‐overload conceptualization in assessing changes in mental state and service needs.
机译:AIM证据表明,许多患者在疾病过程中被发现并治疗,即使在进入心理健康服务后也会发生大量延误。虽然有几项研究已经审查了服务用户和护嘉观察治疗延误的观点,但很少有人从服务提供商的角度探索了这个问题。本研究的目的是通过探索社区心理健康服务治疗延迟原因,通过探索服务提供商的观点来扩大对治疗延迟的理解。方法采用来自社区精神保健的33名医疗保健专业人员的焦点组访谈中数据的定性研究。采访数据经过数字记录和翻译,并使用接地理论方法进行分析。结果服务提供商认为发散或相互矛盾的观点是早期精神病的主要挑战。选择临床谈判作为描述患者和医疗保健专业人士之间的相互作用的主要术语:这是在3个重叠领域观察到的:(1)将患者身份作为帮助寻求者谈判; (2)谈判治疗的地方和条件和(3)谈判令人痛苦的经验的意义和治疗方案的时机。结论本研究表明,社区心理健康中精神病治疗的延迟与早期脱离的临床挑战与服务和诊断不确定性有关。发现谈判治疗关系和患者以患者为中心的灵活性在确保比例的外联方法方面更有用。通过注意使用遇险过载的概念化来评估精神状态和服务需求的变化来解决诊断不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号