首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
【24h】

Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.

机译:学龄儿童听力努力的行为措施:检查信噪比,听力损失和扩增的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increased listening effort in school-age children with hearing loss (CHL) could compromise learning and academic achievement. Identifying a sensitive behavioral measure of listening effort for this group could have both clinical and research value. This study examined the effects of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), hearing loss, and personal amplification on 2 commonly used behavioral measures of listening effort: dual-task visual response times (visual RTs) and verbal response times (verbal RTs). A total of 82 children (aged 6-13 years) took part in this study; 37 children with normal hearing (CNH) and 45 CHL. All children performed a dual-task paradigm from which both measures of listening effort (dual-task visual RT and verbal RT) were derived. The primary task was word recognition in multi-talker babble in three individually selected SNR conditions: Easy, Moderate, and Hard. The secondary task was a visual monitoring task. Listening effort during the dual-task was quantified as the change in secondary task RT from baseline (single-task visual RT) to the dual-task condition. Listening effort based on verbal RT was quantified as the time elapsed from the onset of the auditory stimulus to the onset of the verbal response when performing the primary (word recognition) task in isolation. CHL completed the task aided and/or unaided to examine the effect of amplification on listening effort. Verbal RTs were generally slower in the more challenging SNR conditions. However, there was no effect of SNR on dual-task visual RT. Overall, verbal RTs were significantly slower in CHL versus CNH. No group difference in dual-task visual RTs was found between CNH and CHL. No effect of amplification was found on either dual-task visual RTs or verbal RTs. This study compared dual-task visual RT and verbal RT measures of listening effort in the child population. Overall, verbal RTs appear more sensitive than dual-task visual RTs to the negative effects of SNR and hearing loss. The current findings extend the literature on listening effort in the pediatric population by demonstrating that, even for speech that is accurately recognized, school-age CHL show a greater processing speed decrement than their normal-hearing counterparts, a decrement that could have a negative impact on learning and academic achievement in the classroom.
机译:在学龄儿童中提高听力损失(CHL)的听力努力可能会妥协学习和学术成就。确定该组的聆听努力的敏感行为措施可以具有临床和研究价值。本研究检测了信噪比(SNR),听力损失和个人放大对2个常用行为措施的影响:双重任务视觉响应时间(视觉RTS)和口头响应时间(口头RTS) 。共有82名儿童(6-13岁)参与了这项研究; 37名具有正常听力(CNH)和45 CHL的儿童。所有孩子均执行了双重任务范式,从中派生了听力努力的措施(双任务视觉RT和口头RT)。主要任务是三个单独选定的SNR条件中的多讲话者咔哒声中的字识别:简单,中等和硬。二次任务是视觉监控任务。在双重任务期间的聆听工作被量化为从基线(单任务视觉RT)到双任务条件的次级任务RT的变化。根据言语Rt的聆听努力量化,因为在孤立地执行主要(Word识别)任务时,听觉刺激的发作到言语响应的发作的时间。 CHL完成了任务和/或努力,以检查扩增对听力努力的影响。口头RTS在SNR条件越具挑战性的情况下通常较慢。但是,SNR对双任务视觉RT的影响。总体而言,言语RTS在CHL与CNH中显着较慢。在CNH和CHL之间找不到双任务视觉RTS中的组差异。在双重任务视觉RTS或口头RTS上没有发现扩增的影响。本研究比较了儿童人口中听觉努力的双重任务视觉RT和口头RT测量。总的来说,口头RTS看起来比双任务视觉RTS更敏感到SNR和听力损失的负面影响。目前的调查结果通过证明即使是准确认识到的言论,学龄CHL表现出比正常听力对应物更大的加工速度减少,所以逐渐产生负面影响论教室的学习与学术成就。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ear and hearing.》 |2019年第2期|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology University of Chester Parkgate Road Chester United Kingdom;

    Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;

    Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center Vanderbilt University;

    Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center Vanderbilt University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 耳鼻咽喉科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号