...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
【24h】

Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

机译:从助听援助候选人到助听器采用的时间:纵向队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Although many individuals with hearing loss could benefit from intervention with hearing aids, many do not seek or delay seeking timely treatment after the onset of hearing loss. There is limited data-based evidence estimating the delay in adoption of hearing aids with anecdotal estimates ranging from 5 to 20 years. The present longitudinal study is the first to assess time from hearing aid candidacy to adoption in a 28-year ongoing prospective cohort of older adults, with the additional goal of determining factors influencing delays in hearing aid adoption, and self-reported successful use of hearing aids. Design: As part of a longitudinal study of age-related hearing loss, a wide range of demographic, biologic, and auditory measures are obtained yearly or every 2 to 3 years from a large sample of adults, along with family, medical, hearing, noise exposure, and hearing aid use histories. From all eligible participants (age >= 18; N = 1530), 857 were identified as hearing aid candidates either at baseline or during their participation, using audiometric criteria. Longitudinal data were used to track transition to hearing aid candidacy and hearing aid adoption. Demographic and hearing-related characteristics were compared between hearing aid adopters and nonadopters. Unadjusted estimated overall time (in years) to hearing aid adoption and estimated delay times were stratified by demographic and hearing-related factors and were determined using a time-to-event analysis (survival analysis). Factors influencing rate of adoption in any given time period were examined along with factors influencing successful hearing aid adoption. Results: Age, number of chronic health conditions, sex, retirement status, and education level did not differ significantly between hearing aid adopters and nonadopters. In contrast, adopters were more likely than nonadopters to be married, of white race, have higher socioeconomic status, have significantly poorer higher frequency (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0 kHz) pure-tone averages, poorer word recognition in quiet and competing multi-talker babble, and reported more hearing handicap on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly/Adults emotional and social subscales. Unadjusted estimation of time from hearing aid candidacy to adoption in the full participant cohort was 8.9 years (SE +/- 0.37; interquartile range = 3.2-14.9 years) with statistically significant stratification for race, hearing as measured by low- and high-frequency pure-tone averages, keyword recognition in low-context sentences in babble, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly/Adults social score. In a subgroup analysis of the 213 individuals who adopted hearing aids and were assigned a success classification, 78.4% were successful. No significant predictors of success were found. Conclusions: The average delay in adopting hearing aids after hearing aid candidacy was 8.9 years. Nonwhite race and better speech recognition (in a more difficult task) significantly increased the delay to treatment. Poorer hearing and more self-assessed hearing handicap in social situations significantly decreased the delay to treatment. These results confirm the assumption that adults with hearing loss significantly delay seeking treatment with hearing aids.
机译:目标:虽然许多有助听器的个人可以从助听器中受益于干预助剂,但许多人不寻求或延迟听力损失后及时治疗。基于数据的基于数据有限估算了通过5至20年的止血剂估算采用助听器的延迟。目前的纵向研究是第一个评估助听援助候选人在28年持续的老年人领域采用的时间,以及确定影响助听援助采用的延误的因素的额外目标,以及自我报告的听证会艾滋病。设计:作为年龄相关的听力损失的纵向研究的一部分,每年获得广泛的人口,生物学和听觉措施,从大型成人样本以及家庭,医疗,听证会上获得每年或每2至3年的每2至3年获得一次,噪音曝光和助听器使用历史。从所有符合条件的参与者(年龄> = 18; n = 1530),857人被确定为基线或参与期间的助听援助候选人,使用听力标准。纵向数据用于跟踪助听援助候选和助听器采用的过渡。在助听器采用剂和非移交器之间比较了人口和听力相关的特征。未经调整的估计时间(多年)对助听器采用和估计的延迟时间由人口统计和听力相关因素分类,并使用时间 - 事件分析(存活分析)确定。在任何特定时间段内影响采用率的因素随着影响成功助听援助通过的因素。结果:年龄,慢性健康状况,性别,退休地位和教育水平的年龄在助听器采用者和非移交器之间没有显着差异。相比之下,采用者比非搬家更有可能结婚,白种比赛,具有较高的社会经济地位,具有较高的频率(2.0,3.0,4.0,6.0和8.0 kHz)纯净的平均值,较差的单词识别安静并竞争多讲话者Babble,并报告了对老年人/成人情感和社会分类的听力障碍库存更多听力障碍。从助听援助候选资助在完整的参与者队列中采用的时间不受调整估算时间为8.9岁(SE +/- 0.37;四分位数范围= 3.2-14.9岁),通过低频和高频测量的竞争,听证会统计学上显着的分层纯音平均值,在Babble中的低语境句子中识别,以及老年人/成年人社会评分的听力障碍库存。在采用助听器的213个人的亚组分析中,获得了成功分类,78.4%是成功的。没有发现成功的重大预测因素。结论:在助听援助候选后采用助听器的平均延迟为8.9岁。非白种种族和更好的语音识别(在更艰巨的任务中)显着提高了治疗的延迟。在社交场合中较贫穷的听证和更自我评估的听力障碍显着降低了治疗的延迟。这些结果证实了成年人对听力损失的假设明显延迟了助听器的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号