...
首页> 外文期刊>Facial plastic surgery: FPS >Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Compared to Other Anatomical Sites in a Real-World Setting: Importance of Surgical Therapy for Facial Tumors
【24h】

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Compared to Other Anatomical Sites in a Real-World Setting: Importance of Surgical Therapy for Facial Tumors

机译:头部和颈部的梅尔克尔细胞癌与现实世界的其他解剖部位相比:面部肿瘤外科治疗的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine skin tumor with a high propensity for nodal involvement, local recurrence, and distant metastases. Up to 50% of MCC arises on head and neck (HN), which may impede oncological treatment due to insufficiently wide excisions and a lower rate of sentinel lymph node detection due to more complicated lymph drainage. Several studies have compared the clinical outcome of HN-MCC with those of non-head and neck (NHN) MCC yielding inconsistent results. This single-center, retrospective analysis compared the clinical outcome of 26 HN-MCC patients with 30 NHN-MCC patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method assuming proportional hazards. The mean resection margins were 1.6 and 2.0 cm for the HN and NHN cohort, respectively. Local relapses were more frequently observed in patients with HN-MCC (19 vs. 10%). Patients with HN-MCC had a median OS of 4.3 years compared with 7.5 years in patients with NHN-MCC (p = 0.277). The median OS by tumor stage was 11, 3, 2, and 3 years in stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively (p = 0.009). The median DFS in HN-MCC was 10 years and not reached in the cohort with NHN-MCC patients (p = 0.939). Our data suggest a trend toward poorer outcomes of HN-MCC compared with NHN-MCC. Patients with MCC on the head and neck carry a higher risk for local relapse, requiring resolute surgical treatment also in facial localizations at early stages.
机译:Merkel细胞癌(MCC)是一种罕见且积极的神经内分泌皮肤肿瘤,具有高倾向的节点受累,局部复发和远处转移。在头部和颈部(HN)上出现了高达50%的MCC,这可能导致由于宽度不充分的自发电和较低的淋巴结检测,因此由于更复杂的淋巴引流而导致的肿瘤治疗。几项研究将HN-MCC的临床结果与非头部和颈部(NHN)MCC的临床结果进行了比较,产生不一致的结果。该单中心,回顾性分析比较了26例NHN-MCC患者26例HN-MCC患者的临床结果。通过假设比例危害的Kaplan-Meier方法计算总存活(OS)和无病生存(DFS)。对于HN和NHN队列,平均切除边距分别为1.6和2.0厘米。 HN-MCC(19 vs.10%)的患者中更常见地观察到局部复发。 HN-MCC患者的中位数OS为4.3岁,与NHN-MCC患者有70岁(P = 0.277)。肿瘤阶段的中值OS分别为阶段I,II,III和IV疾病中的11,3,2和3年(P = 0.009)。 HN-MCC中的中位数DFS为10年,未达到NHN-MCC患者的队列(P = 0.939)。我们的数据表明,与NHN-MCC相比,HN-MCC的较差结果趋势。头部和颈部MCC的患者对局部复发的风险较高,需要在早期阶段的面部本地化中进行溶性手术治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号