首页> 外文期刊>Geriatrics & gerontology international. >Comparative economic evaluation of home‐based and hospital‐based palliative care for terminal cancer patients
【24h】

Comparative economic evaluation of home‐based and hospital‐based palliative care for terminal cancer patients

机译:末期癌症患者的家庭和医院姑息治疗的比较经济评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aim To quantify the difference between adjusted costs for home‐based palliative care and hospital‐based palliative care in terminally ill cancer patients. Methods We carried out a case–control study of home‐care patients (cases) who had died at home between January 2009 and December 2013, and hospital‐care patients (controls) who had died at a hospital between April 2008 and December 2013. Data on patient characteristics were obtained from insurance claims data and medical records. We identified the determinants of home care using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine treatment duration in both types of care, and a generalized linear model was used to estimate the reduction in treatment costs associated with home care. Results The case and control groups comprised 48 and 99 patients, respectively. Home care was associated with one or more person(s) living with the patient (adjusted OR 6.54, 95% CI 1.18–36.05), required assistance for activities of daily living (adjusted OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.12–10.51), non‐use of oxygen inhalation therapy (adjusted OR 12.75, 95% CI 3.53–46.02), oral or suppository opioid use (adjusted OR 5.74, 95% CI 1.11–29.54) and transdermal patch opioid use (adjusted OR 8.30, 95% CI 1.97–34.93). The adjusted hazard ratio of home care for treatment duration was not significant (adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59–1.53). However, home care was significantly associated with a reduction of $7523 (95% CI $7093–7991, P = 0.015) in treatment costs. Conclusions Despite similar treatment durations between the groups, treatment costs were substantially lower in the home‐care group. These findings might inform the policymaking process for improving the home‐care support system. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2247–2254 .
机译:摘要旨在量化末期癌症患者的家庭姑息治疗与医院姑息治疗的调整成本差异。方法对2013年1月至2013年1月和2013年12月在家中死亡的家庭护理患者(案例)的病例对照研究,以及2008年4月至2013年12月在医院死亡的医院护理患者(对照)。患者特征数据是从保险权利要求数据和医疗记录获得的。我们通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定了家庭护理的决定因素。 Cox比例危害分析用于检查两种类型的护理中的治疗持续时间,并且广泛的线性模型用于估计与家庭护理相关的治疗成本的降低。结果案例和对照组分别组成48和99名患者。家庭护理与患者居住的一个或多个人(调整或6.54,95%CI 1.18-36.05)相关联,每日生活活动(调整或3.61,95%CI 1.12-10.51),非 - 使用氧气吸入治疗(调整或12.75,95%CI 3.53-46.02),口服或栓剂阿片类药物(调整或5.74,95%CI 1.11-29.54)和透皮贴剂阿片类药物使用(调整或8.30,95%CI 1.97 -34.93)。治疗持续时间的家庭护理的调整后危险比不显着(调节或0.95,95%CI 0.59-1.53​​)。但是,在治疗成本中,家庭护理与减少7523美元(95%CI $ 7093-7991,P = 0.015)。结论尽管群体之间存在类似的治疗持续时间,所以治疗成本在家庭护理组中基本上较低。这些调查结果可能会通知政策制定工艺来改善家庭护理支持系统。 Geriadt Gerontol int 2017; 17:2247-2254。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号