...
首页> 外文期刊>Geocarto international >Evaluation and comparison of LogitBoost Ensemble, Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis, logistic regression and support vector machines methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
【24h】

Evaluation and comparison of LogitBoost Ensemble, Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis, logistic regression and support vector machines methods for landslide susceptibility mapping

机译:Logitboost合奏的评估与比较,Fisher的Linear判别分析,Logistic回归和支持拦截敏感性映射方法的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the capabilities of four machine learning methods namely LogitBoost Ensemble (LBE), Fisher's Linear Discriminate Analysis (FLDA), Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) to select the best method for landslide susceptibility mapping. A part of landslide prone area of Tehri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand state, India, was selected as a case study. Validation of models was carried out using statistical analysis, the chi square test and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Result analysis shows that the LBE has the highest prediction ability (AUC = 0.972) for landslide susceptibility mapping, followed by the SVM (0.945), the LR (0.873) and the FLDA (0.870), respectively. Therefore, the LBE is the best and a promising method in comparison to other three models for landslide susceptibility mapping.
机译:本研究的目的是调查和比较四种机器学习方法的能力即Logitboost集合(LBE),Fisher的线性判别分析(FLDA),Logistic回归(LR)和支持向量机(SVM)来选择最佳方法 滑坡易感性映射。 选择了印度乌塔塔克手州特雷利加尔沃尔区的山体滑坡易一地区的一部分作为案例研究。 使用统计分析,CHI方检验和接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线进行模型进行验证。 结果分析表明,LBE具有用于滑坡易感性映射的最高预测能力(AUC = 0.972),其次是SVM(0.945),LR(0.873)和FLDA(0.870)。 因此,与滑坡易感映射的其他三种模型相比,LBE是最好的和有希望的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号